A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control

[1]  Richard T. Dyde,et al.  Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  P. Dixon,et al.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  S J Anderson,et al.  Evidence for dissociation between the perceptual and visuomotor systems in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp , 2001, Current Biology.

[5]  M. Goodale,et al.  Grasping after a Delay Shifts Size-Scaling from Absolute to Relative Metrics , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Melvyn A Goodale,et al.  Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action , 2000, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Fahle,et al.  Grasping Visual Illusions: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action , 2000, Psychological science.

[9]  F. Pavani,et al.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  P. Donkelaar.  Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  M. Goodale,et al.  Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Characteristics of surround inhibition in cat area 17 , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  S. Chieffi,et al.  Visual illusion and action , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[16]  L. Jakobson,et al.  Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[19]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system , 2000, Vision Research.

[23]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  The Judd illusion: evidence for two visual streams or two experimental conditions? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .