How do latecomer firms achieve catch-up through technology management: a comparative analysis

[1]  Daitian Li,et al.  When are acquisitions a viable catch-up strategy? Some empirical evidence from China , 2022, Long Range Planning.

[2]  C. Giachetti,et al.  Catching up with the market leader: Does it pay to rapidly imitate its innovations? , 2022, Research Policy.

[3]  B. Lundvall,et al.  China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems , 2022, Research Policy.

[4]  B. Ebersberger,et al.  International knowledge interactions and catch-up. Evidence from European patent data for Chinese latecomer firms , 2021 .

[5]  A. Rosiello,et al.  A dynamic multi-sector analysis of technological catch-up: The impact of technology cycle times, knowledge base complexity and variety , 2021, Research Policy.

[6]  K. Kwak,et al.  Unpacking transnational industry legitimacy dynamics, windows of opportunity, and latecomers’ catch-up in complex product systems , 2020, Research Policy.

[7]  Qiang Ji,et al.  Technological catching up and innovation policies in China: What is behind this largely successful story? , 2020 .

[8]  María García‐Vega,et al.  Do university technology transfers increase firms’ innovation? , 2020 .

[9]  Kerstin J. Schaefer.  Catching up by hiring: The case of Huawei , 2020, Journal of International Business Studies.

[10]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  Overcoming institutional voids as a pathway to becoming ambidextrous: The case of China's Sichuan Telecom , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[11]  P. Gao,et al.  ICTs in the transformation of rural enterprises in China: A multi-layer perspective , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[12]  H. Yazdifar,et al.  Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[13]  Xiaobai Shen,et al.  Building ‘mass’ and ‘momentum’ – a latecomer country’s passage to large technological systems – the case of China , 2018, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[14]  P. Naudé,et al.  How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity , 2018, Industrial Marketing Management.

[15]  C. Cao,et al.  The evolving relations between government agencies of innovation policymaking in emerging economies: A policy network approach and its application to the Chinese case , 2018 .

[16]  Shoko Haneda,et al.  Organizational and human resource management and innovation: Which management practices are linked to product and/or process innovation? , 2018 .

[17]  Dong Liu,et al.  Human Resource Systems, Employee Creativity, and Firm Innovation: The Moderating Role of Firm Ownership , 2017 .

[18]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Public policy and catching up by developing countries in global industries: a simulation model , 2017 .

[19]  L. Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning and Management of Technology , 2017 .

[20]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership:Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems ☆ , 2017 .

[21]  Franco Malerba,et al.  A history-friendly model of the successive changes in industrial leadership and the catch-up by latecomers , 2017 .

[22]  W. Grabowski,et al.  Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from two catching-up countries , 2017 .

[23]  Slavo Radosevic,et al.  Why do we need a theory and metrics of technology upgrading? , 2016 .

[24]  D. Probert,et al.  Technology management as a profession and the challenges ahead , 2016 .

[25]  José Figueiredo,et al.  Resource management process framework for dynamic NPD portfolios , 2015 .

[26]  Jie Yan,et al.  Case analysis of imitative innovation in Chinese manufacturing SMEs: Products, features, barriers and competences for transition , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[27]  M. Hobday,et al.  Latecomer firm strategies in complex product systems (CoPS): The case of Iran’s thermal electricity generation systems , 2015 .

[28]  P. Gao.  Government in the catching-up of technology innovation: Case of administrative intervention in China , 2015 .

[29]  Marcelo Seido Nagano,et al.  Information culture and its influences in knowledge creation: Evidence from university teams engaged in collaborative innovation projects , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[30]  S. Joo,et al.  Is the technological capability gap between Hyundai and Mitsubishi converging or diverging? Findings from patent data analysis , 2015 .

[31]  Keun Lee,et al.  How Absorptive Capacity is Formed in a Latecomer Economy: Different Roles of Foreign Patent and Know-how Licensing in Korea , 2015 .

[32]  Jina Kang,et al.  External technology acquisition: a double-edged sword , 2015 .

[33]  Yi Ruan,et al.  Government׳s role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: The case of the electric bike in China , 2014 .

[34]  Yingqi Wei,et al.  Cultural Proximity and Local Firms’ catch up with Multinational Enterprises , 2014 .

[35]  Michael Gibbert,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Financial Resource Constraints and Innovation , 2014 .

[36]  Jae-Yong Choung,et al.  Transitions of Innovation Activities in Latecomer Countries: An Exploratory Case Study of South Korea , 2014 .

[37]  Victor P. Seidel,et al.  Managing the Repertoire: Stories, Metaphors, Prototypes, and Concept Coherence in Product Innovation , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[38]  K. Sengupta,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry , 2013 .

[39]  José Emilio Navas-López,et al.  The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation , 2013 .

[40]  Xudong Gao,et al.  Reprint of: Catching up through the development of technology standard: The case of TD-SCDMA in China , 2012 .

[41]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Expatriate Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity, and Subsidiary Performance , 2012 .

[42]  Heiner Evanschitzky,et al.  Success Factors of Product Innovation: An Updated Meta‐Analysis , 2012 .

[43]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Is National Culture a Meaningful Concept? , 2012 .

[44]  Chong Wu,et al.  How China's equipment manufacturing firms achieve successful independent innovation , 2012 .

[45]  S. Ramani,et al.  Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework , 2012 .

[46]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: evidence from six industries , 2011 .

[47]  M. Bell,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Firm-Centered Knowledge Networks and Capabilities in Late Industrializing Countries: The Case of Petrobras in the Offshore Oil Innovation System in Brazil , 2011 .

[48]  Richard Li-Hua,et al.  Modes of technological leapfrogging: Five case studies from China , 2011 .

[49]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Discontinuous innovation capability accumulation in latecomer natural resource-processing firms , 2010 .

[50]  Marco Guglielmi,et al.  The technology management process at the European space agency , 2010 .

[51]  Tomoko Kawakami,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of Senior Management Policy, Marketing–Manufacturing Involvement, and Innovation Performance , 2010 .

[52]  Jieun Seong,et al.  Catching‐up and post catching‐up strategies of latecomer firms: Evidence from samsung semiconductor , 2010 .

[53]  Afie M. Badawy,et al.  Technology management simply defined: A tweet plus two characters , 2009 .

[54]  Dilek Çetindamar,et al.  Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities , 2009 .

[55]  Show-Ling Jang,et al.  How do latecomers catch up with forerunners? Analysis of patents and patent citations in the field of flat panel display technologies , 2009, Scientometrics.

[56]  D. Ding,et al.  A strategic analysis of surging Chinese manufacturers: The case of Galanz , 2008 .

[57]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan , 2008 .

[58]  D. Alden,et al.  Diffusion of Measurement Invariance Assessment in Cross-National Empirical Marketing Research: Perspectives from the Literature and a Survey of Researchers , 2008 .

[59]  Chie-Bein Chen,et al.  Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty , 2008 .

[60]  J. Alegre,et al.  Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test , 2008 .

[61]  Nukhet Harmancioglu,et al.  Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: assessment and guidelines , 2008 .

[62]  Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation strategy: The challenge for latecomers in emerging economies , 2008 .

[63]  Cheryl Gaimon,et al.  The Management of Technology: A Production and Operations Management Perspective , 2008 .

[64]  G. Jefferson,et al.  Science and Technology Take-off in China?: Sources of Rising R&D Intensity , 2007 .

[65]  G. Hofstede.  Asian management in the 21st century , 2007 .

[66]  Yasemin Y. Kor,et al.  Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy , 2006 .

[67]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  A measurement scale for product innovation performance , 2006 .

[68]  Michael Song,et al.  Best new product development and management practices in the Korean high-tech industry , 2006 .

[69]  C. Craig,et al.  On Improving the Conceptual Foundations of International Marketing Research , 2006 .

[70]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology management tools: concept, development and application , 2006 .

[71]  A. Pilkington,et al.  Management of technology: themes, concepts and relationships , 2006 .

[72]  P. Fan.  Catching up through developing innovation capability: evidence from China's telecom-equipment industry , 2006 .

[73]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Firm-level Innovation Models: Perspectives on Research in Developed and Developing Countries , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[74]  Keun Lee,et al.  Making a Technological Catch‐up: Barriers and opportunities , 2005 .

[75]  John Bessant,et al.  Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership , 2004 .

[76]  H. Greve.  A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding , 2003 .

[77]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Learning, capability accumulation and firms differences: evidence from latecomer steel , 2003 .

[78]  Ad Kleingeld,et al.  Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization☆ , 1999 .

[79]  A. Margherita,et al.  Technological innovation vs technological backwardness patterns in latecomer firms: An absorptive capacity perspective , 2019, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.

[80]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation with Limited Resources: Management Lessons from the German Mittelstand , 2018 .

[81]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  Establishing rigor in mail-survey procedures in international business research , 2015 .

[82]  Heesang Lee,et al.  National characteristics and competitiveness in MOT research: A comparative analysis of ten specialty journals, 2000–2009 , 2012 .

[83]  Jaehoon Rhee,et al.  Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation , 2010 .

[84]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[85]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  Theoretical justification of sampling choices in international marketing research: key issues and guidelines for researchers , 2003 .