Laboratory performance of reduced-scale reinforced embankments at different moisture contents

Abstract The paper describes instrumentation, testing, and detailed results of three 1-m high reinforced embankment models that were built in the laboratory at three different gravitational water contents (GWC). Each embankment model was subjected to a strip load near its crest until failure. The embankment models were constructed using lean clay at the GWC values ranging between OMC−2% and OMC+2% (OMC: optimum moisture content). Each embankment model included a single reinforcement layer which was placed 180 mm below the embankment surface. The location of the reinforcement layer was selected based on preliminary embankment tests and numerical simulations to ensure that it would intercept the failure surface that developed underneath the strip footing near the embankment slope. The embankments were instrumented with a total of 67 sensors to measure the soil GWC, matric suction and excess pore pressure, reinforcement strains, earth pressure and deformations of the embankment models, and the test box during the tests. The test setup and data described in this paper are part of a long-term study to validate a set of moisture reduction factors (MRF) introduced by the authors in their recent studies which involved pullout and interface shear tests on the same soil and reinforcement materials. Specifically, the data and discussions in this paper provide a basis for further in-depth analysis to verify or modify the authors’ proposed MRF values for actual embankment configurations. Furthermore, the test descriptions and results in this study will be used to validate numerical models to examine the influence of the soil matric suction and moisture content on the soil–geotextile reinforcement interface strength and internal stability of reinforced soil structures. The ultimate goal of the study is to develop a better understanding of the influence of matric suction on the performance of reinforced earthen structures constructed with marginal soils, and improved methodologies for their design.

[1]  A Balachandra Bearing capacity of foundation on slope , 2013 .

[2]  Makoto Nishigaki,et al.  Laboratory rainfall-induced slope failure with moisture content measurement , 2007 .

[3]  Kok-Kwang Phoon Serviceability limit state reliability-based design , 2006 .

[4]  M. Budhu Soil Mechanics and Foundations , 2000 .

[5]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Field study of rainfall infiltration into a grassed unsaturated expansive soil slope , 2007 .

[6]  Ronaldo I. Borja,et al.  Continuum deformation and stability analyses of a steep hillside slope under rainfall infiltration , 2010 .

[7]  R. L. Baus,et al.  Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing above Void , 1983 .

[8]  Shunji Kato,et al.  Study on the Monitoring System of Slope Failure Using Optical Fiber Sensors , 2006 .

[9]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Influence of rainfall intensity and duration on slope stability in unsaturated soils , 1998, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[10]  Robert M. Koerner,et al.  Designing with Geosynthetics , 1986 .

[11]  Ji-Sung Lee,et al.  Slope Stability Characteristic of Unsaturated Weathered Granite Soil in Korea considering Antecedent Rainfall , 2013 .

[12]  R. Fukagawa,et al.  Study of Slope Failure due to Rainfall: A Comparison Between Experiment and Simulation , 2006 .

[13]  Cf Lee,et al.  CAUSATIVE MECHANISMS OF RAINFALL-INDUCED FILL SLOPE FAILURES , 2004 .

[14]  Tony L. T. Zhan,et al.  An analytical solution for rainfall infiltration into an unsaturated infinite slope and its application to slope stability analysis , 2013 .

[15]  Danial Esmaili,et al.  Use of MSE Technology to Stabilize Highway Embankments and Slopes in Oklahoma , 2009 .

[16]  D. G. Fredlund,et al.  Effect of soil suction on slope stability at Notch Hill , 1989 .

[17]  Gaylon S. Campbell,et al.  PSYCHROMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF SOIL WATER POTENTIAL: TEMPERATURE AND BULK DENSITY EFFECTS , 1971 .

[18]  Radhey S. Sharma,et al.  Laboratory Investigation of the Behavior of Square Footings on Reinforced Crushed Limestone , 2008 .

[19]  Ji-Sung Lee,et al.  Slope Stability Characteristic of Unsaturated Weathered Granite Soil in Inje considering Antecedent Rainfall , 2012 .

[20]  Danial Esmaili,et al.  INFLUENCE OF GRAVIMETRIC WATER CONTENT ON GEOTEXTILE REINFORCEMENT PULLOUT RESISTANCE IN MSE WALLS WITH MARGINAL QUALITY SOILS , 2013 .

[21]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Instrumentation of an Unsaturated Expansive Soil Slope , 2007 .

[22]  George Geoffrey Meyerhof,et al.  Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations , 1963 .

[23]  Danial Esmaili,et al.  Reinforcement Pullout Capacity in Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls with Marginal-Quality Soils , 2013 .

[24]  Mizanur Rahman,et al.  Instrumentation and matric suction measurement in a decomposed granite soil slope , 2005 .

[25]  C S Gourley,et al.  FIELD MEASUREMENT OF SOIL SUCTION , 1995 .

[26]  Sang-Seom Jeong,et al.  Influence of rainfall-induced wetting on the stability of slopes in weathered soils , 2004 .