A meaning-based approach to the study of complexity in L2 writing: The case of grammatical metaphor

Abstract This article argues for an alternative approach to complexity in L2 writing that foregrounds the link between aspects of linguistic complexity and its discourse-semantic function of constructing particular types of meanings in written texts. To illustrate a meaning- and form-integrating approach, the paper focuses on nominalizations as a linguistic form recently identified as a potentially significant indicator of complexity of advanced L2 writing. In line with the linguistic theory of meaning making, systemic functional linguistics (SFL), nominalizations are explored as realizations of grammatical metaphor (GM), a concept that helps capture the complexity of the semantic dimension of these linguistic forms. Furthermore, exploring nominalizations as GMs helps explain their discourse function as meeting the demands of more complex communicative tasks typical of advanced literacy contexts. Application of such conceptualization of complexity is illustrated by an analysis of an advanced L2 writing task that demonstrates precisely how nominalizations as GMs enable the L2 writer to meet the complexity of these demands through conceptual refiguration of experience and configuration or development of concepts in texts. The paper concludes with the implications of such an approach for L2 writing research, curriculum construction, and L2 writing pedagogy.

[1]  Alex Housen,et al.  Defining and operationalising L2 complexity , 2012 .

[2]  Hans-Jörg Schmid,et al.  English abstract nouns as conceptual shells : from corpus to cognition , 2000 .

[3]  Beverly Derewianka,et al.  Language development in the transition from childhood to adolescence: the role of grammatical metaphor , 1995 .

[4]  M. Halliday.  Towards a Language-Based Theory of Learning , 1993 .

[5]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners , 2014 .

[6]  S. Hood.  Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change , 2008 .

[7]  Alyson Simpson,et al.  The emergence of grammatical metaphor : literacy-oriented expressions in the everyday speech of young children , 2003 .

[8]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency: Definitions, Measurement and Research. , 2012 .

[9]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Realizing Advanced Foreign Language Writing Development in Collegiate Education: Curricular Design, Pedagogy, Assessment. , 2010 .

[10]  Alex Housen,et al.  Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition , 2009 .

[11]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach , 2014 .

[12]  Mary J. Schleppegrell.  The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective , 2004 .

[13]  Mariana Achugar and M. Cecilia Colombi.  Systemic Functional Linguistic explorations into the longitudinal study of advanced capacities: The case of Spanish heritage language learners , 2009 .

[14]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor , 2009 .

[15]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[16]  Douglas Biber,et al.  University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers , 2006 .

[17]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Theorizing language development at the intersection of ‘task’ and L2 writing: Reconsidering complexity , 2014 .

[18]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Taking Text to Task , 2006 .

[19]  J. Norris,et al.  Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity , 2009 .

[20]  Alex Housen,et al.  Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity , 2014 .

[21]  Michael Halliday.  On language and linguistics , 2003 .

[22]  C. Coffin,et al.  LANGUAGE, REGISTER AND GENRE , 2013 .

[23]  Lourdes Ortega,et al.  Interlanguage complexity A construct in search of theoretical renewal , 2012 .

[24]  Ignacio Galve.  The textual interplay of grammatical metaphor on the nominalizations occurring in written medical English , 1998 .

[25]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[26]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Book Reviews: Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition , 2001 .

[27]  T. Givon.  Mind, Code, and Context: Essays in Pragmatics , 1989 .

[28]  Marianna Ryshina–Pankova.  Toward Mastering the Discourses of Reasoning: Use of Grammatical Metaphor at Advanced Levels of Foreign Language Acquisition. , 2010 .

[29]  Cassi L. Liardét.  An exploration of Chinese EFL learner's deployment of grammatical metaphor: Learning to make academically valued meanings , 2013 .

[30]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions , 2013 .

[31]  Clare Painter.  The use of a metaphorical mode of meaning in early language development , 2003 .

[32]  L. Ortega.  Syntactic Complexity Measures and Their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College-Level L2 Writing. , 2003 .

[33]  Suzanne Eggins,et al.  An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics , 1994 .

[34]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development , 2011 .

[35]  M. Charles.  ‘This mystery…’: a corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines , 2003 .

[36]  Beverly M Derewianka.  Grammatical metaphor in the transition to adolescence , 2003 .

[37]  G. Pallotti.  CAF: Defining, Refining and Differentiating Constructs , 2009 .