Variational principle for shape design sensitivity analysis

In this paper, the adjoint method of design sensitivity analysis is stated as a general variational principle that is applicable to a wide range of problems. The principle gives a very simple and straightforward method of obtaining the design sensitivity expression for a functional dependent on the state fields. The sensitivity expression involves certain adjoint fields and explicit design variations of the functional and the governing equations for the primary state fields. The principle is stated in terms of an augmented functional that is defined by adding to the response functional whose sensitivity is desired, the equilibrium equation of the primary problem. Then explicit design variation of the augmented functional gives the total design variation of the response functional. Stationarity of the augmented functional with respect to the state fields defines the adjoint problem for the response functional. The principle is proved and applied to several classes of linear and nonlinear problems, such as field problems, structural problems, and dynamic response problems. It is shown that the design sensitivity expressions derived in the literature using long procedures are obtained quite routinely by use of the principle.

[1]  J. Reddy An introduction to the finite element method , 1989 .

[2]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Shape design sensitivity analysis of built-up structures , 1986 .

[3]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis , 1989 .

[4]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis of coupled thermoviscoelastic systems , 1993 .

[5]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Methods of Design Sensitivity Analysis in Structural Optimization , 1979 .

[6]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Two Approaches to Sensitivity Analysis for Shape Variation of Structures , 1988 .

[7]  R. Haftka,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Discrete Structural Systems , 1986 .

[8]  F. Kreith,et al.  Principles of heat transfer , 1962 .

[9]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Comparison of methods for design sensitivity analysis for optimal control of thermal systems , 1993 .

[10]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Shape design sensitivity analysis of viscoplastic structures , 1993 .

[11]  K. Surana,et al.  Three dimensional curved shell finite elements for heat conduction , 1987 .

[12]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Nonlinear structural design sensitivity analysis for path dependent problems. Part 2: Analytical examples , 1990 .

[13]  J. Arora,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamic response , 1984 .

[14]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  A design sensitivity analysis principle and its implementation into ADIANA , 1989 .

[15]  Ashok D. Belegundu,et al.  Lagrangian Approach to Design Sensitivity Analysis , 1985 .

[16]  Gene Hou,et al.  Shape-sensitivity analysis and design optimization of linear, thermoelastic solids , 1992 .

[17]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis for nonlinear thermal systems , 1989 .

[18]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis for nonlinear dynamic thermoelastic systems , 1991 .

[19]  J. W. Hou,et al.  Computational method for optimization of structural shapes , 1986 .

[20]  R. B. Haber,et al.  A new variational approach to structural shape design sensitivity analysis , 1987 .

[21]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Variational method for design sensitivity analysis in nonlinear structural mechanics , 1988 .

[22]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Optimum design of nonlinear structures with path dependent reponse , 1989 .

[23]  Subrata Mukherjee,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and shape optimization in nonlinear solid mechanics , 1993 .

[24]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Accuracy of Finite Element Based Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis , 1985 .

[25]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  An exposition of the material derivative approach for structural shape sensitivity analysis , 1993 .

[26]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis for Elastodynamic Systems , 1990 .

[27]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[28]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Structural design sensitivity analysis with general boundary conditions: Dynamic problem , 1984 .

[29]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[30]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of linear elastic systems using domain parameterization and a mixed mutual energy principle , 1989 .

[31]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Shape design sensitivity analysis of field problems , 1991 .

[32]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Nonlinear structural design sensivitity analysis for path dependent problems. Part 1: General theory , 1990 .

[33]  A. Belegundu Optimal control concepts in design sensitivity analysis , 1987 .

[34]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear dynamic response of structural and mechanical systems , 1992 .

[35]  M. E. Botkin,et al.  The Optimum Shape , 1986 .

[36]  A. Belegundu,et al.  A shape optimization approach based on natural design variables and shape functions , 1988 .

[37]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis with Substructuring , 1977 .

[38]  Zenon Mróz,et al.  Variational approach by means of adjoint systems to structural optimization and sensitivity analysis—II: Structure shape variation , 1984 .

[39]  K. Huebner The finite element method for engineers , 1975 .

[40]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  First‐order design sensitivities for transient conduction problems by an adjoint method , 1989 .

[41]  J. Arora,et al.  A sensitivity interpretation of adjoint variables in optimal design , 1985 .