Cross-Layer Extended Persistent Timeout Policy for SCTP and DSDV

Cross layer techniques applied to various protocols stacks provide fair information sharing between OSI model layers. The performance gains have been demonstrated for many studied systems within protocols interactions. The example is illustrative of the reliable transport protocols that use retransmissions to achieve that reliability function. The performance gains of the persistent timeout policy for the management of the retransmission timeout have been produce in some recent works when applying that persistent timeout policy only to reliable transport protocol. The goal was to give an appropriate behavior in response to a bad state of the wireless channel that occurs and temporally blocks the transmission of data. The channel state is given by the 802.11 link layer through cross-layer mechanism. In this paper, the persistent policy is extended to the network layer and is applied to a stack that uses a reactive routing protocol, namely the Destination Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV) protocol that also generates additional periodic traffic regardless to the channel state. We are measuring the influence in terms of performance gains of the extended persistent policy because of the additional periodic signalization messages deriving from the used routing protocol. After the introduction in section I; Section II of this paper presents an overview of the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP). Section III describes the behavior of the DSDV protocol. Section IV presents the extended persistent timeout policy principle and Section V presents the simulation results used to compare the using of the traditional and the extended persistent timeout policies applied to the same protocol stack using SCTP and DSDV.

[1]  Hamadou Saliah-Hassane,et al.  Persistent SCTP timeout policy by using cross-layer mechanism , 2012, 2012 Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS).

[2]  Michael Tüxen,et al.  Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Stream Reconfiguration , 2012, RFC.

[3]  Jon Postel,et al.  Transmission Control Protocol , 1981, RFC.

[4]  Gerhard Münz,et al.  IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Per Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Stream , 2012, RFC.

[5]  Riadh Dhaou,et al.  Rcl : a New Method for Cross–layer Network Modelling and Simulation , 2022 .

[6]  Randall R. Stewart,et al.  Stream Control Transmission Protocol , 2000, RFC.

[7]  David A. Maltz,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4 , 2007, RFC.

[8]  Jürgen Falb,et al.  The Internet Protocol , 2005, The Industrial Information Technology Handbook.

[9]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Protocol Binding MIB for IEEE 802.11 , 2010, RFC.

[10]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[11]  Haitao Zheng,et al.  Optimizing wireless multimedia transmissions through cross layer design , 2003, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME '03. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8698).

[12]  Lili Wang,et al.  A Conservative Loss Recovery Algorithm Based on Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) for TCP , 2012, RFC.

[13]  Riadh Dhaou,et al.  Cross Layer Simulation: Application to Performance Modelling of Networks Composed of MANETs and Satellites , 2011, Network Performance Engineering.

[14]  David B. Johnson,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2003 .

[15]  Vern Paxson,et al.  Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer , 2000, RFC.

[16]  David L. Black,et al.  The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP , 2001, RFC.