Direct tensile strength of lightweight concrete with different specimen depths and aggregate sizes

Abstract To examine the size effect in direct tension, 8 ready-mixed concrete batches classified into all-lightweight concrete (ALWC) and sand-lightweight concrete (SLWC) groups were prepared. In each group, the maximum aggregate size varied between 4 mm and 19 mm, and then the lateral depth of specimen with rectangular section ranged from 100 mm to 500 mm in each concrete batch. The size effect curves based on the basic formulas proposed by Bažant (1984) [1], Kim and Eo (1990) [2], and Yang and Sim (2011) [3] were also determined using a total of 28 lightweight concrete (LWC) data of current tests and 114 normal-weight concrete (NWC) data compiled from the available literature (Carpinteri and Ferro, 1994; Hu, 2011) [4,5], though specimens with lateral depth beside 100 mm is very insufficient even in NWC. The present experimental observations and verifications by prediction models clearly showed that the size effect is more notable with the decrease of the unit weight of concrete and it is stronger in direct tension than in compression. The validity of Bažant’s model (Bažant, 1984) [1] is significantly dependent on the maximum aggregate size, while the models proposed by Kim and Eo (1990) [2] and Yang and Sim (2011) [3] closely predict the size effect trend observed from test data, confirming that the influence of the maximum aggregate size on the concrete tensile strength and the size effect is negligible, especially for LWC.

[1]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Softening Response of Plain Concrete in Direct Tension , 1985 .

[2]  Liu Wenyan,et al.  DETERMINING TENSILE PROPERTIES OF MASS CONCRETE BY DIRECT TENSILE TEST , 1989 .

[3]  Z. Bažant.  Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, Metal , 1984 .

[4]  B. Sengupta,et al.  Influence of Silica Fume on the Tensile Strength of Concrete , 2005 .

[5]  W. Zheng,et al.  Direct tension test of concrete , 2001 .

[6]  Xiaozhi Hu.  Size effect on tensile softening relation , 2011 .

[7]  Hans W. Reinhardt,et al.  Influence of aggregate size on fracture mechanics parameters of concrete , 1987 .

[8]  Shazim Ali Memon,et al.  Effect of lightweight aggregates on the mechanical properties and brittleness of lightweight aggregate concrete , 2012 .

[9]  Chanakya Arya,et al.  Buckling resistance of unstiffened webs , 2009 .

[10]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ACI 318-11) AND COMMENTARY" , 2011 .

[11]  Somsak Swaddiwudhipong,et al.  Direct tension test and tensile strain capacity of concrete at early age , 2003 .

[12]  Alberto Carpinteri,et al.  Size effects on tensile fracture properties: a unified explanation based on disorder and fractality of concrete microstructure , 1994 .

[13]  Tests on Cementless Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete Using Lightweight Aggregates , 2011 .

[14]  Mitsuru Saito,et al.  Direct Tensile Fatigue of Concrete by the Use of Friction Grips , 1983 .

[15]  Farhad Ansari,et al.  HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE IN UNIAXIAL TENSION , 2000 .

[16]  S. A. Majeed.  Effect of Specimen Size on Compressive, Modulus of Rupture and Splitting Strength of Cement Mortar , 2011 .

[17]  Jin-Keun Kim,et al.  Size effect in concrete specimens with dissimilar initial cracks , 1990 .

[18]  A. Neville.  Properties of Concrete , 1968 .