Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation

The architecture and adhesiveness of a cell microenvironment is a critical factor for the regulation of spindle orientation in vivo. Using a combination of theory and experiments, we have investigated spindle orientation in HeLa (human) cells. Here we show that spindle orientation can be understood as the result of the action of cortical force generators, which interact with spindle microtubules and are activated by cortical cues. We develop a simple physical description of this spindle mechanics, which allows us to calculate angular profiles of the torque acting on the spindle, as well as the angular distribution of spindle orientations. Our model accounts for the preferred spindle orientation and the shape of the full angular distribution of spindle orientations observed in a large variety of different cellular microenvironment geometries. It also correctly describes asymmetric spindle orientations, which are observed for certain distributions of cortical cues. We conclude that, on the basis of a few simple assumptions, we can provide a quantitative description of the spindle orientation of adherent cells.

[1]  T. Mitchison.  Actin based motility on retraction fibers in mitotic PtK2 cells. , 1992, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[2]  Manuel Théry,et al.  The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  E. Fuchs,et al.  Socializing with the Neighbors Stem Cells and Their Niche , 2004, Cell.

[4]  Pierre Gönczy,et al.  Translation of Polarity Cues into Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Caenorhabditis elegans Embryos , 2003, Science.

[5]  C. Doe,et al.  Extrinsic cues orient the cell division axis in Drosophila embryonic neuroblasts , 2006, Development.

[6]  P. Bassereau,et al.  Micropatterned "adherent/repellent" glass surfaces for studying the spreading kinetics of individual red blood cells onto protein-decorated substrates , 2003, European Biophysics Journal.

[7]  T. Raabe,et al.  Drosophila Pins-binding protein Mud regulates spindle-polarity coupling and centrosome organization , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[8]  Yuh Nung Jan,et al.  Adherens junctions inhibit asymmetric division in the Drosophila epithelium , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Anthony A. Hyman,et al.  Spindle Oscillations during Asymmetric Cell Division Require a Threshold Number of Active Cortical Force Generators , 2006, Current Biology.

[10]  M. Fuller,et al.  Orientation of Asymmetric Stem Cell Division by the APC Tumor Suppressor and Centrosome , 2003, Science.

[11]  Scott E. Fraser,et al.  Planar cell polarity signalling controls cell division orientation during zebrafish gastrulation , 2004, Nature.

[12]  I. Macara,et al.  Mammalian Pins Is a Conformational Switch that Links NuMA to Heterotrimeric G Proteins , 2004, Cell.

[13]  M. Bornens,et al.  The Respective Contributions of the Mother and Daughter Centrioles to Centrosome Activity and Behavior in Vertebrate Cells , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  L. Tsai,et al.  G protein betagamma subunits and AGS3 control spindle orientation and asymmetric cell fate of cerebral cortical progenitors. , 2005, Cell.

[15]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Cell shape and cell division. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  L. Tsai,et al.  G Protein βγ Subunits and AGS3 Control Spindle Orientation and Asymmetric Cell Fate of Cerebral Cortical Progenitors , 2005, Cell.

[17]  Elaine Fuchs,et al.  Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin , 2005, Nature.

[18]  Jonathon Howard,et al.  The Distribution of Active Force Generators Controls Mitotic Spindle Position , 2003, Science.

[19]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Theory of mitotic spindle oscillations. , 2005, Physical review letters.