Interaction of fluctuating river flow with a barotropic tide: A demonstration of wavelet tidal analysis methods

Wavelet transforms provide a valuable new tool for analysis of tidal processes that deviate markedly from an assumption of exact periodicity inherent in traditional harmonic analysis. A wavelet basis adapted to nonstationary tidal problems is constructed and employed to analyze the modulation of the external tide in a river by variations in streamflow. Interaction of a surface tide with river flow is the best available demonstration of the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) methods developed. It is the simplest and perhaps the only nonstationary tidal process for which both sufficient data and dynamical understanding exist to allow detailed comparisons between CWT analyses and analytical predictions of the response of tides to nontidal forcing. Variations at upriver locations of low-frequency elevation (river stage ZR) and three tidal species are deduced from cross-sectionally integrated equations. For landward propagation in a channel of constant cross section with quadratic friction, the log of the amplitude of the diurnal (D1), semidiurnal (D2) and quarterdiurnal (D4) elevations should vary at far upriver locations with the square root of the river flow (QR;), and river stage (ZR) should depend on the square of river flow. Convergent geometry and species-species frictional interactions modify these predictions somewhat. CWT analyses show that the predicted amplitude behavior for the tidal species is approximately correct. Best results are obtained for the dominant, dynamically simplest processes (ZR and D2). In the past, further progress in understanding river tides has been limited by a lack of data analysis tools. Data analysis tools are now clearly better than the available analytical solutions.

[1]  O. Rioul,et al.  Wavelets and signal processing , 1991, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  George Howard Darwin.  I. On an apparatus for facilitating the reduction of tidal observations , 1893, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[3]  A. T. Doodson.  The Harmonic Development of the Tide-Generating Potential , 1921 .

[4]  G. Godin.  Modification by an Ice Cover of the Tide in James Bay and Hudson Bay , 1986 .

[5]  W. Munk,et al.  Tidal spectroscopy and prediction , 1966, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  D. Jay,et al.  Modelling tidal energetics of the Columbia River Estuary , 1989 .

[7]  R. Uncles,et al.  The structure of vertical current profiles in a macrotidal, partly-mixed estuary , 1990 .

[8]  D. Jay.  Green's law revisited: tidal long-wave propagation in channels with strong topography , 1991 .

[9]  D. Chapman.  On the Influence of Stratification and Continental Shelf and Slope Topography on the Dispersion of Subinertial Coastally Trapped Waves , 1983 .

[10]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[11]  D. Jay.  Circulatory Processes in the Columbia River Estuary , 1984 .

[12]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  Fourier Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  J. Wolf,et al.  The interaction of surge and tide in the North Sea and River Thames , 1978 .

[14]  L. Maas,et al.  Tide-topography interactions in a stratified shelf sea I. Basic equations for quasi-nonlinear internal tides , 1989 .

[15]  P. Leblond,et al.  On tidal propagation in shallow rivers , 1978 .

[16]  M. Farge.  Wavelet Transforms and their Applications to Turbulence , 1992 .

[17]  Charles A. Simenstad,et al.  Historical changes in the Columbia River Estuary , 1990 .

[18]  G. Godin,et al.  Non-linear effects in the tide of the Bay of Fundy , 1986 .

[19]  Gabriel Godin.  On the Predictability of Currents , 1983 .

[20]  Peter Bloomfield,et al.  Fourier analysis of time series , 1976 .

[21]  Carl T. Friedrichs,et al.  Tidal propagation in strongly convergent channels , 1994 .

[22]  J. Linnett,et al.  Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.

[23]  Remo Guidieri.  Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[24]  J. Hunter,et al.  Fronts in the Irish Sea , 1974, Nature.

[25]  G. Godin,et al.  Variability of the Tide at Some Sites in the Canadian Arctic , 1980 .

[26]  George Esq. Green,et al.  On the Motion of Waves in a variable canal of small depth and width , 1838 .

[27]  L. Small,et al.  Consumption processes and food web structure in the Columbia River Estuary , 1990 .

[28]  C. Chatfield,et al.  Fourier Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  Jeffery D. Musiak,et al.  Particle Trapping in Estuarine Tidal Flows , 1994 .

[30]  Y. Meyer,et al.  Wavelets and Filter Banks , 1991 .

[31]  C. Sherwood,et al.  Energetics and sedimentary processes in the Columbia River Estuary , 1990 .

[32]  J. O'Brien,et al.  An Introduction to Wavelet Analysis in Oceanography and Meteorology: With Application to the Dispersion of Yanai Waves , 1993 .

[33]  Jrg Kaiser,et al.  Nonrecursive digital filter design using the I-sinh window function , 1977 .

[34]  VetterliM.,et al.  Wavelets and Filter Banks , 1992 .

[35]  J. Dronkers,et al.  Tidal computations in rivers and coastal waters , 1964 .

[36]  A. Messiah.  Quantum Mechanics , 1961 .

[37]  D. Cartwright,et al.  A unified analysis of tides and surges round North and East Britain , 1968, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[38]  M. Rahman,et al.  Tidal Response in Estuaries , 1980 .

[39]  G. Godin.  Modification of river tides by the discharge , 1985 .