Traditional versus computer-based dissections inenhancing learning in a tertiary setting: a student perspective
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Martin Predavec,et al. Evaluation of E-Rat, a computer-based rat dissection, in terms of student learning outcomes , 2001 .
[2] A. Parry. Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .
[3] A. Defina. What Happens to Waste , 1991 .
[4] Mable B. Kinzie,et al. Hi-Tech Alternatives to Dissection , 1991 .
[5] Roger Downie,et al. Experience with a dissection opt-out scheme in university level biology , 1995 .
[6] J. Coast,et al. The rationing debate: Rationing within the NHS should be explicit: The case for , 1997 .
[7] N. Denzin,et al. Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .
[8] Mable B. Kinzie,et al. The effects of an interactive dissection simulation on the performance and achievement of high school biology students , 1993 .
[9] Joseph P. Akpan,et al. Issues Associated with Inserting Computer Simulations into Biology Instruction: A Review of the Literature , 2001 .
[10] G. Langley,et al. Animals in science education—ethics and alternatives , 1991 .
[11] Ron Oliver,et al. Student responses to collaborating and learning in a web-based environment , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[12] Anthony G. Wheeler,et al. Justifying the Dissection of Animals in Biology Teaching. , 1993 .
[13] David Dewhurst,et al. An interactive computer-based alternative to performing a rat dissection in the classroom , 1992 .