The Guidance of Visual Search by Shape Features and Shape Configurations

Representations of target features (attentional templates) guide attentional object selection during visual search. In many search tasks, targets objects are defined not by a single feature but by the spatial configuration of their component shapes. We used electrophysiological markers of attentional selection processes to determine whether the guidance of shape configuration search is entirely part-based or sensitive to the spatial relationship between shape features. Participants searched for targets defined by the spatial arrangement of two shape components (e.g., hourglass above circle). N2pc components were triggered not only by targets but also by partially matching distractors with one target shape (e.g., hourglass above hexagon) and by distractors that contained both target shapes in the reverse arrangement (e.g., circle above hourglass), in line with part-based attentional control. Target N2pc components were delayed when a reverse distractor was present on the opposite side of the same display, suggesting that early shape-specific attentional guidance processes could not distinguish between targets and reverse distractors. The control of attention then became sensitive to spatial configuration, which resulted in a stronger attentional bias for target objects relative to reverse and partially matching distractors. Results demonstrate that search for target objects defined by the spatial arrangement of their component shapes is initially controlled in a feature-based fashion but can later be guided by templates for spatial configurations.

[1]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Target objects defined by a conjunction of colour and shape can be selected independently and in parallel , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[2]  M. Eimer,et al.  The spatially global control of attentional target selection in visual search , 2017 .

[3]  M. Eimer,et al.  Category-based guidance of spatial attention during visual search for feature conjunctions. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Nick Berggren,et al.  The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. Eimer,et al.  The guidance of spatial attention during visual search for color combinations and color configurations. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M. Eimer,et al.  All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Eimer The neural basis of attentional control in visual search , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The gradual emergence of spatially selective target processing in visual search: From feature-specific to object-based attentional control. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M. Eimer,et al.  Top-down task sets for combined features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Jessica L. Irons,et al.  All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Adamo,et al.  Multiple attentional control settings influence late attentional selection but do not provide an early attentional filter , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[12]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Cortico-cortical interactions in spatial attention: A combined ERP/TMS study. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[18]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.

[19]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Alexander B. Bilsky,et al.  Parallel processing of park-whole information in visual search tasks , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[28]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[29]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[31]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[32]  M Carrasco,et al.  “Transient structures”: The effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.