Calibration of SWAT models using the cloud

This paper evaluates a recently created Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) calibration tool built using the Windows Azure Cloud environment and a parallel version of the Dynamically Dimensioned Search (DDS) calibration method modified to run in Azure. The calibration tool was tested for six model scenarios constructed for three watersheds of increasing size each for a 2 year and 10 year simulation duration. Results show significant speedup in calibration time and, for up to 64 cores, minimal losses in speedup for all watershed sizes and simulation durations. An empirical relationship is presented for estimating the time needed to calibration a SWAT model using the cloud calibration tool as a function of the number of Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs), time steps, and cores used for the calibration. A cloud-based, parallel SWAT calibration algorithm is evaluated.1000 runs are sufficient for flow calibration using up to 256 cores in parallel.Speedup of the parallel SWAT calibration tool is linear for up to 64 cores.Cost to calibrate a SWAT model can be estimated from HRU and time step counts.

[1]  Zhenyao Shen,et al.  Assessment of effects of best management practices on agricultural non-point source pollution in Xiangxi River watershed , 2013 .

[2]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[3]  S. Anderson,et al.  Assessment of EIB: What you need to know to optimize test results. , 2013, Immunology and allergy clinics of North America.

[4]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  A view of cloud computing , 2010, CACM.

[5]  Chen Lei,et al.  The influence of parameter distribution uncertainty on hydrological and sediment modeling: a case study of SWAT model applied to the Daning watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China , 2012, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[6]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models , 2003 .

[7]  Richard G. Allen,et al.  A Penman for All Seasons , 1986 .

[8]  Chris Rose,et al.  A Break in the Clouds: Towards a Cloud Definition , 2011 .

[9]  MiSeon Lee,et al.  Evaluation of non-point source pollution reduction by applying best management practices using a SWAT model and QuickBird high resolution satellite imagery. , 2010, Journal of environmental sciences.

[10]  P. Mell,et al.  The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[11]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Scaling up processes and models from the field plot to the watershed and regional areas. , 1996 .

[12]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model , 2001 .

[13]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration , 2007 .

[14]  Marvin E. Jensen,et al.  Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration , 1989 .

[15]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[16]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  A parallelization framework for calibration of hydrological models , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Jonathan L. Goodall,et al.  Calibration of watershed models using cloud computing , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on E-Science.

[18]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization , 1993 .

[19]  Luis Rodero-Merino,et al.  A break in the clouds: towards a cloud definition , 2008, CCRV.

[20]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[21]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Modeling of Sediment Yield From Anjeni‐Gauged Watershed, Ethiopia Using SWAT Model 1 , 2010 .

[22]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part III - The Ray catchment at Grendon Underwood , 1970 .

[23]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Estimating Uncertain Flow and Transport Parameters Using a Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure , 2004 .

[24]  M. Butts,et al.  Flexible Integrated Watershed Modeling with MIKE SHE , 2005 .

[25]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[26]  Jeffery S. Horsburgh,et al.  Development of a Community Hydrologic Information System , 2009 .

[27]  Gilbert T. Bernhardt,et al.  A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model , 1993 .