An analytical and numerical analysis of several locally conformal FDTD schemes

The virtues of the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method for the electromagnetic analysis of arbitrary complex metal and dielectric structures are well known. Almost equally well known are the difficulties encountered by the technique when the material boundaries do not coincide with the Cartesian mesh. Until recently, there were few alternatives to the simple, but inaccurate, staircase approximation for these cases. However, over the past few years, there have been several solutions proposed, which maintain the simplicity and efficiency of the FDTD method while providing an accurate treatment of curved, offset, or sloping metallic boundaries. In this paper, analytical and numerical comparisons are presented and a clear recommended method is shown to emerge.

[1]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Finite-difference time-domain modeling of curved surfaces (EM scattering) , 1992 .

[2]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Review of the formulation and applications of the finite-difference time-domain method for numerical modeling of electromagnetic wave interactions with arbitrary structures , 1988 .

[3]  Ian J Craddock,et al.  Derivation and application of a passive equivalent circuit for the finite difference time domain algorithm , 1996 .

[4]  S. Stuchly,et al.  Practical 3-D contour/staircase treatment of metals in FDTD , 1996 .

[5]  Ian J Craddock,et al.  Analysis of general 3-D PEC structures using improved CPFDTD algorithm , 1995 .

[6]  W. K. Gwarek,et al.  Analysis of an Arbitrarily-Shaped Planar Circuit a Time-Domain Approach , 1985 .

[7]  R. Mittra,et al.  A locally conformal finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) algorithm for modeling three-dimensional perfectly conducting objects , 1997 .

[8]  Wojciech K. Gwarek,et al.  Higher-Order Modelling of Media Interfaces for Enhanced FDTD Analysis of Microwave Circuits , 1994, 1994 24th European Microwave Conference.

[9]  N. Madsen.  Divergence preserving discrete surface integral methods for Maxwell's curl equations using non-orthogonal unstructured grids , 1995 .

[10]  M. Celuch-Marcysiak,et al.  Generalized TLM algorithms with controlled stability margin and their equivalence with finite-difference formulations for modified grids , 1995 .

[11]  Cj Railton,et al.  Stabilised CPFDTD algorithm for the analysis of arbitrary 3D PEC structures , 1996 .

[12]  Raj Mittra,et al.  A TECHNIQUE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE FDTD ALGORITHM ON A NONORTHOGONAL GRID , 1997 .

[13]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[14]  John B. Schneider,et al.  FDTD simulations of TEM horns and the implications for staircased representations , 1997 .

[15]  Yanfen Hao,et al.  Analyzing electromagnetic structures with curved boundaries on Cartesian FDTD meshes , 1998 .

[16]  A. Cangellaris,et al.  Analysis of the numerical error caused by the stair-stepped approximation of a conducting boundary in FDTD simulations of electromagnetic phenomena , 1991 .

[17]  R. Holland,et al.  Pitfalls of staircase meshing , 1993 .

[18]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Three-dimensional contour FDTD modeling of scattering from single and multiple bodies , 1993 .