Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsies.

Systematic biopsies are a useful, sensitive means to detect carcinoma of the prostate. However, multiple biopsies pose a risk for detecting clinically insignificant prostate cancer, that is those cancers less than 0.5 cc in volume, which occur in approximately 32% of all white men more than 50 years old. Systematic biopsies were positive for cancer in 442 of 816 patients and 60 (14%) demonstrated only a minute focus of cancer (3 mm. or less) in 1 of the 6 biopsy specimens. In 27 patients with these minute foci who underwent radical prostatectomy a wide range of cancer volumes was observed; 30% of these 27 cancers were less than 0.5 cc (15% less than 0.2 cc) and may not have required therapy. Thus, the overall risk of detecting an insignificant cancer is 4.0% with systematic biopsies. Performance of confirmatory biopsies in patients with a minute focus (3 mm. or less) of cancer on initial systematic biopsies resulted in cancers less than 0.5 cc being removed in only 1 of 10 radical prostatectomies (10%, none was less than 0.2 cc). Thus, with the addition of confirmatory biopsies the risk of detecting insignificant cancer is 1.4%. Conservative management is recommended for patients without significant cancer on repeat biopsies in whom initial biopsies have revealed only a minute focus of cancer in 1 of the biopsy cores. We believe that concern is also warranted for patients who have 3 mm. or less of cancer demonstrated by several nonsystematic biopsies directed at a suspicious hypoechoic lesion in whom the digital rectal examination is normal.

[1]  P. Scardino,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer. , 1989, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[2]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[3]  A S Whittemore,et al.  Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[4]  M. Terris,et al.  Efficacy of transrectal ultrasound for identification of clinically undetected prostate cancer. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[5]  J. Trachtenberg,et al.  Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate , 1988 .

[6]  W. Cooner,et al.  Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[7]  T. Stamey,et al.  Observations on the doubling time of prostate cancer. The use of serial prostate‐specific antigen in patients with untreated disease as a measure of increasing cancer volume , 1993, Cancer.

[8]  T. Stamey,et al.  Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[9]  J. McNeal,et al.  An abbreviated standard procedure for accurate tumor volume estimation in prostate cancer. , 1992, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[10]  D. Prapotnich,et al.  Systematic prostatic biopsies in 100 men with no suspicion of cancer on digital rectal examination. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[11]  T. Stamey,et al.  Morphometric and clinical studies on 68 consecutive radical prostatectomies. , 1988, The Journal of urology.