A Matter of Timing: Unsynchronized Antigen Expression and Antigen Presentation Diminish Secondary T Cell Responses1

Despite the low and short expression of secondary Ag, prime-boost immunizations using homologous or heterologous vectors are capable of amplifying memory CD8+ T cells. This is mainly attributed to the rapid presentation of Ag by APCs and the high proliferative capacity of memory CD8+ T cells. Nevertheless, certain viruses and vectors often require prolonged Ag presentation for optimal T cell priming, and the influence of such a prolonged presentation during secondary immune induction is not clear. To address this issue, we primed and boosted mice intradermally (i.d.) with plasmid DNA that was recently reported to require prolonged Ag presentation for maximal CD8+ T cell priming. Although functional memory CD8+ T cells were present in the mice after i.d. priming, the secondary CD8+ T cell response elicited was limited and reached a similar level of that observed during priming. The initial levels of secondary Ag expressed in the boosted mice were sufficient to prime CD8+ T cell response in naive hosts, suggesting that lower Ag load alone does not explain the limited secondary immune responses observed. Removal of the injection site 5 or 10 days after i.d. boosting immunization resulted in diminished Ag presentation and no expansion of memory CD8+ T cells. In fact, Ag-presenting activity following boost occurred mainly two weeks postimmunization, a time when the Ag was no longer expressed in situ. These findings suggest that when the boosting vector triggers prolonged Ag presentation, the lack of synchronicity between Ag accessibility and Ag presentation limits secondary immune responses.

[1]  A. García-Sastre,et al.  Memory CD8+ T Cell Responses Expand When Antigen Presentation Overcomes T Cell Self-Regulation1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[2]  M. Fay,et al.  A West Nile virus DNA vaccine induces neutralizing antibody in healthy adults during a phase 1 clinical trial. , 2007, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  N. Letvin,et al.  Duration of Antigen Expression In Vivo following DNA Immunization Modifies the Magnitude, Contraction, and Secondary Responses of CD8+ T Lymphocytes1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[4]  M. Robb,et al.  Induction of HIV-specific functional immune responses by a multiclade HIV-1 DNA vaccine candidate in healthy Ugandans. , 2007, Vaccine.

[5]  D. Carucci,et al.  Extended immunization intervals enhance the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of plasmid DNA vaccines. , 2007, Microbes and infection.

[6]  N. Letvin,et al.  The Impact of a Boosting Immunogen on the Differentiation of Secondary Memory CD8+ T Cells , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[7]  Matthew D. H. Lay,et al.  Killer T cells regulate antigen presentation for early expansion of memory, but not naive, CD8+ T cell , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  D. Turner,et al.  Persistent Antigen Presentation after Acute Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Infection , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[9]  F. Stevenson,et al.  Prime-Boost with Alternating DNA Vaccines Designed to Engage Different Antigen Presentation Pathways Generates High Frequencies of Peptide-Specific CD8+ T Cells1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  Brianne R. Barker,et al.  Virus-Specific Cellular Immune Correlates of Survival in Vaccinated Monkeys after Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Challenge , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[11]  Sang-Jun Ha,et al.  Stimulation history dictates memory CD8 T cell phenotype: implications for prime-boost vaccination. , 2006, Journal of immunology.

[12]  J. Villadangos,et al.  Migratory dendritic cells transfer antigen to a lymph node-resident dendritic cell population for efficient CTL priming. , 2006, Immunity.

[13]  D. Montefiori,et al.  Vaccination preserves CD4 memory T cells during acute simian immunodeficiency virus challenge , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  J. Harty,et al.  Programming, demarcating, and manipulating CD8+ T‐cell memory , 2006, Immunological reviews.

[15]  Yukai He,et al.  Skin-derived dendritic cells induce potent CD8(+) T cell immunity in recombinant lentivector-mediated genetic immunization. , 2006, Immunity.

[16]  J. Harty,et al.  Secondary memory CD8+ T cells are more protective but slower to acquire a central–memory phenotype , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  D. Turner,et al.  Residual antigen presentation after influenza virus infection affects CD8 T cell activation and migration. , 2006, Immunity.

[18]  Deborah M. Brown,et al.  Unexpected prolonged presentation of influenza antigens promotes CD4 T cell memory generation , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[19]  M. Bevan,et al.  CD4+ T cells are required for the maintenance, not programming, of memory CD8+ T cells after acute infection , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[20]  Scott N. Mueller,et al.  Cutting Edge: Prolonged Antigen Presentation after Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Skin Infection1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[21]  E. Pamer,et al.  Rapid Development of T Cell Memory1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[22]  M. Bevan,et al.  Defective CD8 T Cell Memory Following Acute Infection Without CD4 T Cell Help , 2003, Science.

[23]  Rustom Antia,et al.  Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[24]  H. Liao,et al.  Cytokine Requirements for Induction of Systemic and Mucosal CTL After Nasal Immunization1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[25]  S. Jennings,et al.  Diminished secondary CTL response in draining lymph nodes on cutaneous challenge with herpes simplex virus. , 2000, The Journal of general virology.

[26]  M. Plebanski,et al.  Induction of CD8+ T cells using heterologous prime‐boost immunisation strategies , 1999, Immunological reviews.

[27]  T. Hogg,et al.  Enumeration of antigen-presenting cells in mice infected with Sendai virus. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[28]  Christine Zimmermann,et al.  Kinetics of the response of naive and memory CD8 T cells to antigen: similarities and differences , 1999, European journal of immunology.

[29]  D. Busch,et al.  Evolution of a Complex T Cell Receptor Repertoire during Primary and Recall Bacterial Infection , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[30]  J. Altman,et al.  Virus-specific CD8+ T cells in primary and secondary influenza pneumonia. , 1998, Immunity.

[31]  J. Altman,et al.  Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. , 1998, Immunity.

[32]  A. Iwasaki,et al.  Differential dependence on target site tissue for gene gun and intramuscular DNA immunizations. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[33]  R A Houghten,et al.  Induction of broadly cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells recognizing an HIV-1 envelope determinant. , 1992, Science.

[34]  N. Letvin Progress toward an HIV vaccine. , 2005, Annual review of medicine.