Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis — a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case ☆

Abstract The present study examines a new hybrid method for improving the usability of SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis. A commonly used decision analysis method, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and its eigenvalue calculation framework are integrated with SWOT analysis. AHP’s connection to SWOT yields analytically determined priorities for the factors included in SWOT analysis and makes them commensurable. The aim in applying the hybrid method is to improve the quantitative information basis of strategic planning processes. The hybrid method was tested in connection with a Finnish case study on forest certification. In the case study, the results were presented in an illustrative way by utilizing the quantitative information achieved by the hybrid method. The results indicated that certification could be a potential strategic alternative in our case study farm. In addition, the needed pairwise comparisons were found useful, because they force the decision maker to think over the weights of the factors and to analyze the situation more precisely and in more depth.

[1]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Strategy formulation : analytical concepts , 1978 .

[2]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A Method for Integrating Risk and Attitude Toward Risk into Forest Planning , 1996, Forest Science.

[3]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[4]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Uncertainty in Expert Predictions of the Ecological Consequences of Forest Plans , 1996 .

[5]  Thomas L. Wheelen,et al.  Strategic Management and Business Policy , 1983 .

[6]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Analyzing uncertainties in experts' opinions of forest plan performance , 1997 .

[7]  Fred Flett.  Innovation in Mature Companies – Rejuvenation or Stagnation? , 1989 .

[8]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Strategic Management , 1992 .

[9]  Heinz Weihrich,et al.  The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis , 1982 .

[10]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[11]  H. Karjalainen,et al.  Costs of ecolabelled forestry in WWF's ecolabelling project in Finland , 1997 .

[12]  J. Kangas,et al.  Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences from state owned boreal forests. , 1999 .

[13]  Y. Wind,et al.  An analytic hierarchy process based approach to the design and evaluation of a marketing driven business and corporate strategy , 1987 .

[14]  R. Westbrook,et al.  SWOT Analysis: It's Time for a Product Recall , 1997 .

[15]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A participatory approach to tactical forest planning , 1996 .

[16]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Multiple‐use planning of forest resources by using the analytic hierarchy process , 1992 .

[17]  P. Kotler.  Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control , 1972 .

[18]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[19]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[20]  Malcolm McDonald.  The Marketing Planner , 1991 .