Grouping and Trajectory Storage in Multiple Object Tracking: Impairments Due to Common Item Motions

In our natural viewing, we notice that objects change their locations across space and time. However, there has been relatively little consideration of the role of motion information in the construction and maintenance of object representations. We investigated this question in the context of the multiple object tracking (MOT) paradigm, wherein observers must keep track of target objects as they move randomly amid featurally identical distractors. In three experiments, we observed impairments in tracking ability when the motions of the target and distractor items shared particular properties. Specifically, we observed impairments when the target and distractor items were in a chasing relationship or moved in a uniform direction. Surprisingly, tracking ability was impaired by these manipulations even when observers failed to notice them. Our results suggest that differentiable trajectory information is an important factor in successful performance of MOT tasks. More generally, these results suggest that various types of common motion can serve as cues to form more global object representations even in the absence of other grouping cues.

[1]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[2]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[3]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple parallel access in visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[4]  James V. Stone,et al.  Object recognition: view-specificity and motion-specificity , 1999, Vision Research.

[5]  James V. Stone Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures , 1998, Vision Research.

[6]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[7]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Dynamics of Attention in Depth: Evidence from Multi-Element Tracking , 2002, Perception.

[8]  B. Scholl,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article ATTENTIVE TRACKING OF OBJECTS VERSUS SUBSTANCES , 2022 .

[9]  Z. Pylyshyn Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .

[10]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple object tracking and attentional processing. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[11]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[12]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Searching through subsets: a test of the visual indexing hypothesis. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[13]  S. Yantis Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Erik Blaser,et al.  Tracking an object through feature space , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Christian Wallraven,et al.  The role of characteristic motion in object categorization. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[18]  Z. Pylyshyn Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.

[19]  Z. Pylyshyn Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention , 1994, Cognition.

[20]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.