Contribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis

Allergic contact dermatitis, also referred to as contact hypersensitivity, is one the most frequent inflammatory skin diseases, and is characterized by redness, papule and vesicles, followed by scaling and dryness. Allergic contact dermatitis is elicited upon skin contact with nonprotein chemicals, haptens, and corresponds to a cutaneous delayed type hypersensitivity reaction, mediated by hapten-specific T-cells. During the sensitization phase, both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell precursors are activated in the draining lymph nodes by presentation of haptenated peptides by skin dendritic cells. Subsequent hapten painting on a remote skin site induces the recruitment and activation of specific T-cells at the site of challenge. This leads to apoptosis of keratinocytes, recruitment of inflammatory cells and development of clinical symptoms. Experimental studies from the last 10 years have demonstrated that, in normal contact hypersensitivity responses to strong haptens, CD8+ type 1 T-cells are effector cells of contact hypersensitivity through cytotoxicity and interferon-γ production, while CD4+ T-cells are endowed with downregulatory functions. The latter may correspond to the recently described CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell population. However, in some instances, especially when there is a deficient CD8+ T-cell pool, CD4+ T-cells can be effector cells of contact hypersensitivity. Ongoing studies will have to confirm that the pathophysiology of human allergic contact dermatitis is similar to the mouse contact hypersensitivity and that the contact hypersensitivity response to common weak haptens, most frequently involved in human allergic contact dermatitis, is similar to that reported for strong haptens.

[1]  A. Cavani Immune Mechanisms in Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 2005 .

[2]  J. Barker Skin immune system (SIS): cutaneous immunology and clinical immunodermatology. , 2005 .

[3]  R. Fairchild,et al.  The intensity of neutrophil infiltration controls the number of antigen‐primed CD8 T cells recruited into cutaneous antigen challenge sites , 2004, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[4]  J. Simon,et al.  Fas-Mediated Inhibition of CD4+ T Cell Priming Results in Dominance of Type 1 CD8+ T Cells in the Immune Response to the Contact Sensitizer Trinitrophenyl1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[5]  P. Askenase,et al.  Extravascular T-cell recruitment requires initiation begun by Valpha14+ NKT cells and B-1 B cells. , 2004, Trends in immunology.

[6]  P. Cohen,et al.  Regulation of the Epithelial Ca2+ Channel TRPV5 by the NHE Regulating Factor NHERF2 and the Serum and Glucocorticoid Inducible Kinase Isoforms SGK1 and SGK3 Expressed in Xenopus oocytes , 2004, Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry.

[7]  G. Girolomoni,et al.  Chemokine networks in inflammatory skin diseases. , 2004, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[8]  S. Akira,et al.  Essential role of MHC II-independent CD4+ T cells, IL-4 and STAT6 in contact hypersensitivity induced by fluorescein isothiocyanate in the mouse. , 2004, International immunology.

[9]  R. Fairchild,et al.  CD4+ T Cells Regulate CD8+ T Cell-Mediated Cutaneous Immune Responses by Restricting Effector T Cell Development through a Fas Ligand-Dependent Mechanism 1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  J. Saloga,et al.  Ultrastructural cytochemical visualization of chromium in the skin of sensitized guinea pigs , 2004, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[11]  P. Askenase,et al.  Cutaneous Immunization Rapidly Activates Liver Invariant Vα14 NKT Cells Stimulating B-1 B Cells to Initiate T Cell Recruitment for Elicitation of Contact Sensitivity , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[12]  C. Griffiths,et al.  Epidermal Langerhans cell migration and sensitisation to chemical allergens , 2003, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[13]  F. Bérard,et al.  Allergen penetration through the skin. , 2003, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[14]  I. Hand,et al.  Reliabilität der deutschen Version der Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale , 2003, Verhaltenstherapie.

[15]  C. Akdis,et al.  T helper (Th) 2 predominance in atopic diseases is due to preferential apoptosis of circulating memory/effector Th1 cells , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[16]  A. Goubier,et al.  CD4+CD25+ T cells as key regulators of immune responses. , 2003, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[17]  F. Bérard,et al.  Afferent and efferent phases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) can be induced after a single skin contact with haptens: evidence using a mouse model of primary ACD. , 2003, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[18]  A. Blauvelt,et al.  11. Allergic and immunologic diseases of the skin. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[19]  R. Paus,et al.  IL-2-IgG2b fusion protein suppresses murine contact hypersensitivity in vivo. , 2002, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[20]  D. Sauder,et al.  Contact hypersensitivity: the mechanism of immune responses and T cell balance. , 2002, Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research.

[21]  J. Kehren,et al.  Skin Inflammation During Contact Hypersensitivity Is Mediated by Early Recruitment of CD8+ T Cytotoxic 1 Cells Inducing Keratinocyte Apoptosis1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[22]  G. Belz,et al.  Cutting Edge: Precursor Frequency Affects the Helper Dependence of Cytotoxic T Cells1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[23]  D. Buckley,et al.  Fragrance as an occupational allergen. , 2002, Occupational medicine.

[24]  C. Albanesi,et al.  T-cell subpopulations in the development of atopic and contact allergy. , 2001, Current opinion in immunology.

[25]  C. Akdis,et al.  Targeting keratinocyte apoptosis in the treatment of atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. , 2001, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[26]  P. Askenase Yes T cells, but three different T cells (αβ, γδ and NK T cells), and also B‐1 cells mediate contact sensitivity , 2001 .

[27]  K. Nishioka,et al.  γδ T cells assist αβ T cells in the adoptive transfer of contact hypersensitivity to para‐phenylenediamine , 2001 .

[28]  J. Yewdell,et al.  Multiple Paths for Activation of Naive CD8+ T Cells: CD4-Independent Help1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[29]  C. Albanesi,et al.  Effector and regulatory T cells in allergic contact dermatitis. , 2001, Trends in immunology.

[30]  R. Fairchild,et al.  CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Priming for Contact Hypersensitivity Occurs Independently of CD40-CD154 Interactions1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[31]  R. Fairchild,et al.  Regulatory role of CD4+ T cells during the development of contact hypersensitivity responses , 2001, Immunologic research.

[32]  T. Mak,et al.  CD4+ Th1 and CD8+ Type 1 Cytotoxic T Cells Both Play a Crucial Role in the Full Development of Contact Hypersensitivity1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[33]  I. Kimber,et al.  Role of CD4+ T helper 2‐type cells in cutaneous inflammatory responses induced by fluorescein isothiocyanate , 2000, Immunology.

[34]  G. Kollias,et al.  Mast Cells Control Neutrophil Recruitment during T Cell–Mediated Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reactions through Tumor Necrosis Factor and Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 2 , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[35]  D. Taub,et al.  Early Local Generation of C5a Initiates the Elicitation of Contact Sensitivity by Leading to Early T Cell Recruitment1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[36]  J. Simon,et al.  Peptide immunization indicates that CD8+ T cells are the dominant effector cells in trinitrophenyl-specific contact hypersensitivity. , 2000, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[37]  J. Lepoittevin,et al.  Hapten-peptide-T cell receptor interactions: molecular basisfor the recognition of haptens by T lymphocytes , 2000 .

[38]  P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli,et al.  Immature Dendritic Cells Acquire Cd8+Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Priming Capacity upon Activation by T Helper Cell–Independent or–Dependent Stimuli , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[39]  D. Belsito,et al.  The diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prevention of allergic contact dermatitis in the new millennium. , 2000, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[40]  J. Kehren,et al.  Oral Administration of Hapten Inhibits In Vivo Induction of Specific Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cells Mediating Tissue Inflammation: A Role for Regulatory CD4+ T Cells1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[41]  T. Brunner,et al.  Differential Contribution of Fas- and Perforin-Mediated Mechanisms to the Cell-Mediated Cytotoxic Activity of Naive and In Vivo-Primed Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[42]  C. Akdis,et al.  T cell-mediated Fas-induced keratinocyte apoptosis plays a key pathogenetic role in eczematous dermatitis. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[43]  C. Tannenbaum,et al.  Groα‐mediated recruitment of neutrophils is required for elicitation of contact hypersensitivity , 1999 .

[44]  D. Basketter,et al.  Toxicology of Contact Dermatitis: Allergy, Irritancy and Urticaria , 1999 .

[45]  M. Hahne,et al.  Cytotoxicity Is Mandatory for CD8+ T Cell–mediated Contact Hypersensitivity , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[46]  P. Askenase,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of CD8+ T cell-mediated delayed hypersensitivity: implications for allergies, asthma, and autoimmunity. , 1999, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[47]  J. Kehren,et al.  Contact dermatitis I. Pathophysiology of contact sensitivity. , 1999, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[48]  G. Girolomoni,et al.  Patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel and nonallergic individuals display different nickel-specific T cell responses. Evidence for the presence of effector CD8+ and regulatory CD4+ T cells. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[49]  A. Cavani,et al.  Contact hypersensitivity in MHC class II-deficient mice depends on CD8 T lymphocytes primed by immunostimulating Langerhans cells. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[50]  J. Kehren,et al.  Dual role of dendritic cells in the induction and down-regulation of antigen-specific cutaneous inflammation. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[51]  S. Grabbe,et al.  Immunoregulatory mechanisms involved in elicitation of allergic contact hypersensitivity. , 1996, Immunology today.

[52]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[53]  A. Elbe-Bürger,et al.  MHC class I+/II- dendritic cells induce hapten-specific immune responses in vitro and in vivo. , 1997, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[54]  J. Nicolas,et al.  Lack of oral tolerance but oral priming for contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene in major histocompatibility complex class II‐deficient mice and in CD4+ T cell‐depleted mice , 1996, European journal of immunology.

[55]  T. Mak,et al.  Hyporesponsiveness in contact hypersensitivity and irritant contact dermatitis in CD4 gene targeted mouse. , 1996, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[56]  R. Fairchild,et al.  T cell populations primed by hapten sensitization in contact sensitivity are distinguished by polarized patterns of cytokine production: interferon gamma-producing (Tc1) effector CD8+ T cells and interleukin (Il) 4/Il-10-producing (Th2) negative regulatory CD4+ T cells , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[57]  J. Revillard,et al.  Major histocompatibility complex class I‐restricted CD8+ T cells and class II‐restricted CD4+ T cells, respectively, mediate and regulate contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene , 1995, European journal of immunology.

[58]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  T cell development in CD8-/- mice. Thymic positive selection is biased toward the helper phenotype. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[59]  C. Elmets,et al.  Metabolic requirements for induction of contact hypersensitivity to immunotoxic polyaromatic hydrocarbons. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[60]  K. Schön,et al.  Paradoxical IgA immunity in CD4-deficient mice. Lack of cholera toxin-specific protective immunity despite normal gut mucosal IgA differentiation. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[61]  G Berke,et al.  The CTL's kiss of death , 1995, Cell.

[62]  P. Cruz,et al.  Contact sensitization induces proliferation of heterogeneous populations of hapten‐specific T cells 1 , 1994, Experimental dermatology.

[63]  R. Locksley,et al.  Helper T cells without CD4: control of leishmaniasis in CD4-deficient mice. , 1993, Science.

[64]  C. Benoist,et al.  Another view of the selective model of thymocyte selection , 1993, Cell.

[65]  S. Martin,et al.  Role of hapten-anchoring peptides in defining hapten-epitopes for MHC-restricted cytotoxic T cells. Cross-reactive TNP-determinants on different peptides. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[66]  P. Frosch,et al.  Textbook of Contact Dermatitis , 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[67]  M. Schilham,et al.  Normal development and function of CD8+ cells but markedly decreased helper cell activity in mice lacking CD4 , 1991, Nature.

[68]  D. Gray,et al.  Mice lacking MHC class II molecules , 1991, Cell.

[69]  R. Tigelaar,et al.  Roles of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in murine contact sensitivity revealed by in vivo monoclonal antibody depletion. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[70]  D. Norris Immune mechanisms in cutaneous disease. , 1989, Immunology series.

[71]  R. Buller,et al.  Induction of cytotoxic T-cell responses in vivo in the absence of CD4 helper cells , 1987, Nature.

[72]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Isolation and characterization of Ni-specific T cell clones from patients with Ni-contact dermatitis. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[73]  M. Dorf,et al.  Hapten-specific T cell response to 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl acetyl. X. Characterization of distinct T cell subsets mediating cutaneous sensitivity responses. , 1981, Journal of immunology.

[74]  G. Dupuis Studies on poison ivy , 1979, The British journal of dermatology.