Can a Shaft Brush be Safely Applied on a Motor in a Class I Hazardous Location?

Some inverter-fed motors, particularly at higher power ratings, are supplied with a shaft brush in order to help mitigate bearing currents. As more inverters are applied to motors in Class I Division 1/Zone 1 and Class I Division 2/Zone 2 locations, there is a need to understand whether a shaft brush can be safely applied in such an environment. This paper addresses the physics of why this is a concern and a methodology to evaluate the relative safety of two example cases. These issues are considered from the perspective of users, manufacturers of inverters and motors, and certifying bodies. The question posed in the title of this paper is answered by considering whether the addition of a shaft brush to an inverter-fed motor in a Class I hazardous location makes the system more safe or less safe.

[1]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Source of induction motor bearing currents caused by PWM inverters , 1996 .

[2]  K. Reichert,et al.  Shaft voltages in generators with static excitation systems-problems and solution , 1988 .

[3]  J. Erdman,et al.  Effect of PWM inverters on AC motor bearing currents and shaft voltages , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition - APEC'95.

[4]  B. Lockley,et al.  Application considerations for class-1 div-2 inverter-fed motors , 2006 .

[5]  M. J. Melfi,et al.  Inverter driven induction motor bearing current solutions , 2002, Record of Conference Papers. Industry Applications Society. Forty-Ninth Annual Conference. 2002 Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference.

[6]  B. Lockley,et al.  Application considerations for class-1 div-2 inverter-fed motors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[7]  Annette Muetze,et al.  Calculation of Circulating Bearing Currents in Machines of Inverter-Based Drive Systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  R. C. Quirt Voltages to ground in load-commutated inverters , 1988 .