Spotting Faked Identities via Mouse Dynamics Using Complex Questions

The increment of criminals, including terrorists, crossing international borders using faked identities is a crucial issue. This paper validates a computerized technique to spot people who declare false identity information. Forty participants were asked to answer complex questions about their identity, clicking with the mouse on the correct alternative response on the computer screen. Half of the participants answered truthfully, while the others were instructed to lie. As long as the subject responded to questions, mouse dynamics were recorded. Because lying is cognitively demanding, liars had fewer cognitive resources available to analyse complex questions and to compute the response. As result, they showed a bad performance in the task compared with truth-tellers, revealing a greater number of errors, slower reaction times and larger mouse trajectories. Different machine learning classifiers were trained by a cross validation procedure, achieving a classification accuracy up to 90% in detecting liars.

[1]  Galit Nahari,et al.  Exploiting liars' verbal strategies by examining the verifiability of details , 2014 .

[2]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Current Research and Potential Applications of the Concealed Information Test: An Overview , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[3]  Li Su,et al.  Countering Countermeasures: Detecting Identity Lies by Detecting Conscious Breakthrough , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  Identity Verification Using a Kinematic Memory Detection Technique , 2017 .

[5]  S. Sawilowsky New Effect Size Rules of Thumb , 2009 .

[6]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  How Human-Mouse Interaction can Accurately Detect Faked Responses About Identity , 2016, Symbiotic.

[7]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Telling Lies: The Irrepressible Truth? , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Lyn M. Van Swol,et al.  Communicating Deception: Differences in Language Use, Justifications, and Questions for Lies, Omissions, and Truths , 2014 .

[9]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  False Identity Detection Using Complex Sentences , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  The autobiographical IAT: a review , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Eibe Frank,et al.  Logistic Model Trees , 2003, ECML.

[12]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  The Detection of Malingering: A New Tool to Identify Made-Up Depression , 2018, Front. Psychiatry.

[13]  Matthias Gamer,et al.  Influence of countermeasures on the validity of the Concealed Information Test. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[14]  S. Cessie,et al.  Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression , 1992 .

[15]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  The detection of faked identity using unexpected questions and mouse dynamics , 2017, PloS one.

[16]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Detecting fakers of the autobiographical IAT , 2011 .

[17]  S. Sathiya Keerthi,et al.  Improvements to Platt's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design , 2001, Neural Computation.

[18]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[19]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  ID‐Check: Online Concealed Information Test Reveals True Identity , 2016, Journal of forensic sciences.

[20]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[21]  Jonathan B Freeman,et al.  MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[22]  A. Vrij,et al.  Outsmarting the Liars: The Benefit of Asking Unanticipated Questions , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[23]  Mauro Conti,et al.  Covert lie detection using keyboard dynamics , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Mauro Conti,et al.  Type Me the Truth!: Detecting Deceitful Users via Keystroke Dynamics , 2017, ARES.

[25]  Fenna H. Poletiek,et al.  The Effects of Unexpected Questions on Detecting Familiar and Unfamiliar Lies , 2013 .

[26]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: the benefits of asking unanticipated questions on lie detection , 2013 .

[27]  Aspen H. Yoo,et al.  Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: searching for cognitive mechanisms , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations , 2007 .

[29]  Mark A. Hall,et al.  Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning , 2003 .