A multi-layer monitoring system for clinical management of Congestive Heart Failure

BackgroundCongestive Heart Failure (CHF) is a serious cardiac condition that brings high risks of urgent hospitalization and death. Remote monitoring systems are well-suited to managing patients suffering from CHF, and can reduce deaths and re-hospitalizations, as shown by the literature, including multiple systematic reviews.MethodsThe monitoring system proposed in this paper aims at helping CHF stakeholders make appropriate decisions in managing the disease and preventing cardiac events, such as decompensation, which can lead to hospitalization or death. Monitoring activities are stratified into three layers: scheduled visits to a hospital following up on a cardiac event, home monitoring visits by nurses, and patient's self-monitoring performed at home using specialized equipment. Appropriate hardware, desktop and mobile software applications were developed to enable a patient's monitoring by all stakeholders. For the first two layers, we designed and implemented a Decision Support System (DSS) using machine learning (Random Forest algorithm) to predict the number of decompensations per year and to assess the heart failure severity based on a variety of clinical data. For the third layer, custom-designed sensors (the Blue Scale system) for electrocardiogram (EKG), pulse transit times, bio-impedance and weight allowed frequent collection of CHF-related data in the comfort of the patient's home.We also performed a short-term Heart Rate Variability (HRV) analysis on electrocardiograms self-acquired by 15 healthy volunteers and compared the obtained parameters with those of 15 CHF patients from PhysioNet's PhysioBank archives.ResultsWe report numerical performances of the DSS, calculated as multiclass accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in a 10-fold cross-validation. The obtained average accuracies are: 71.9% in predicting the number of decompensations and 81.3% in severity assessment. The most serious class in severity assessment is detected with good sensitivity and specificity (0.87 / 0.95), while, in predicting decompensation, high specificity combined with good sensitivity prevents false alarms. The HRV parameters extracted from the self-measured EKG using the Blue Scale system of sensors are comparable with those reported in the literature about healthy people.ConclusionsThe performance of DSSs trained with new patients confirmed the results of previous work, and emphasizes the strong correlation between some CHF markers, such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and ejection fraction (EF), with the outputs of interest. Comparing HRV parameters from healthy volunteers with HRV parameters obtained from PhysioBank archives, we confirm the literature that considers the HRV a promising method for distinguishing healthy from CHF patients.

[1]  E H Wagner,et al.  Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[2]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Rehospitalization for heart failure: predict or prevent? , 2012, Circulation.

[3]  Paolo Melillo,et al.  Discrimination power of long-term heart rate variability measures for chronic heart failure detection , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Performance Assessment of a Clinical Decision Support System for Analysis of Heart Failure , 2014 .

[5]  Biykem Bozkurt,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[6]  S Hood,et al.  Clinical service organisation for heart failure. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  A Torricelli,et al.  Pulse transit time measured by photoplethysmography improves the accuracy of heart rate as a surrogate measure of cardiac output, stroke volume and oxygen uptake in response to graded exercise , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[8]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[9]  C. Holly Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure , 2011 .

[10]  D. Nunan,et al.  A Quantitative Systematic Review of Normal Values for Short‐Term Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults , 2010, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  M. Drazner,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  A Machine Learning System to Improve Heart Failure Patient Assistance , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[13]  J. N. Orellana,et al.  Normal values of heart rate variability at rest in a young, healthy and active Mexican population , 2012 .

[14]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[15]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Random forest for automatic assessment of heart failure severity in a telemonitoring scenario , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  Ying-Ying Zheng,et al.  Radial pulse transit time is an index of arterial stiffness , 2011, Hypertension Research.

[17]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  National Patterns of Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: Update on Publicly Reported Outcomes Measures Based on the 2010 Release , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[18]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  A Tool for Patient Data Recovering Aimed to Machine Learning Supervised Training , 2014 .

[19]  Shuai Xu,et al.  A Novel Handheld Device for Use in Remote Patient Monitoring of Heart Failure Patients—Design and Preliminary Validation on Healthy Subjects , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[20]  Paolo Melillo,et al.  Discrimination Power of Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Measures for CHF Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[21]  Martin Underwood,et al.  Clinical service organisation for heart failure (Review) , 2012 .

[22]  M. Dolgin,et al.  Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels , 1994 .

[23]  Lei Wang,et al.  A New Approach to Detect Congestive Heart Failure Using Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Measures , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  M. Drazner,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[25]  S. Normand,et al.  Patterns of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure 30-Day Mortality and Readmission , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[26]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  Blue scale: Early detection of impending congestive heart failure events via wireless daily self-monitoring , 2014, 2014 IEEE Healthcare Innovation Conference (HIC).

[27]  Ernesto Iadanza,et al.  A System to Improve Continuity of Care in Heart Failure Patients , 2014, HEALTHINF 2014.

[28]  Paolo Melillo,et al.  Classification Tree for Risk Assessment in Patients Suffering From Congestive Heart Failure via Long-Term Heart Rate Variability , 2013, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.