The Stability of the Point-Spread Function of the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope and Implications for Weak Gravitational Lensing

We examine the spatial and temporal stability of the Hubble Space Telescope's Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) Wide Field Camera (WFC) point-spread function (PSF) using the 2 deg2 COSMOS survey. This is important for studies of weak gravitational lensing, where the ability to deconvolve the PSF from galaxy shapes is of paramount importance. We show that stochastic aliasing of the PSF necessarily occurs during "drizzling." This aliasing is maximal if the output-pixel scale is equal to the input-pixel scale. This source of PSF variation can be significantly reduced by choosing a Gaussian drizzle kernel with a size of 0.8 input pixels and by reducing the output-pixel scale. We show that the PSF is temporally unstable, resulting in an overall slow periodic focus change in the COSMOS images. Using a modified version of the Tiny Tim PSF modeling software, we create grids of undistorted stars over a range of telescope focus values. We then use the approximately 10 well-measured stars in each COSMOS field to pick the best-fit focus value for each field. The Tiny Tim model stars can then be used to perform PSF corrections for weak lensing. We derive a parametric correction for the effect of charge transfer efficiency (CTE) degradation on the shapes of objects in the COSMOS field as a function of observation date, position within the ACS WFC field, and object flux. Finally, we discuss future plans to improve the CTE correction.

[1]  D. Calzetti,et al.  The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing , 2007, astro-ph/0703095.

[2]  Cea,et al.  Weak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements , 2007, astro-ph/0702359.

[3]  R. Ellis,et al.  Dark matter maps reveal cosmic scaffolding , 2007, Nature.

[4]  L. Guzzo,et al.  The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Overview , 2006, astro-ph/0612305.

[5]  D. Thompson,et al.  COSMOS Morphological Classification with the Zurich Estimator of Structural Types (ZEST) and the Evolution Since z = 1 of the Luminosity Function of Early, Disk, and Irregular Galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0611644.

[6]  R. Ellis,et al.  The Shear TEsting Programme 2: Factors affecting high precision weak lensing analyses , 2006, astro-ph/0608643.

[7]  Anton M. Koekemoer,et al.  The 2005 HST Calibration Workshop Hubble After the Transition to Two-Gyro Mode , 2006 .

[8]  H. Ford,et al.  Weak-lensing Detection at z ~ 1.3: Measurement of the Two Lynx Clusters with the Advanced Camera for Surveys , 2006, astro-ph/0601334.

[9]  D. Coe,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Weak-Lensing and Chandra X-Ray Studies of the High-Redshift Cluster MS 1054–0321 , 2005 .

[10]  S. Casertano,et al.  HST Temporal Optical Behavior & Current Focus Status , 2005 .

[11]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations , 2005, astro-ph/0506112.

[12]  Marco Sirianni,et al.  Internal monitoring of ACS charge transfer efficiency , 2005 .

[13]  M. Lombardi,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope ACS Weak-Lensing Analysis of the Galaxy Cluster RDCS 1252.9–2927 at z = 1.24 , 2005, astro-ph/0501150.

[14]  H. Rix,et al.  Cosmological weak lensing with the HST GEMS survey , 2004, astro-ph/0411324.

[15]  R. Massey,et al.  Polar Shapelets , 2004, astro-ph/0408445.

[16]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Measurement of Cosmic Shear with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph , 2003, astro-ph/0312283.

[17]  Mark Clampin,et al.  Calibration of geometric distortion in the ACS detectors , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[18]  Edinburgh,et al.  Joint cosmic shear measurements with the Keck and William Herschel Telescopes , 2002, astro-ph/0203134.

[19]  Y. Mellier,et al.  B-modes in cosmic shear from source redshift clustering , 2001, astro-ph/0112441.

[20]  D. Bacon,et al.  Shapelets — II. A method for weak lensing measurements , 2001, astro-ph/0105179.

[21]  A. Réfrégier Shapelets: I. a method for image analysis , 2001, astro-ph/0105178.

[22]  N. Benı́tez,et al.  The Photometric Performance and Calibration of the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys , 2005, astro-ph/0507614.

[23]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Weak Lensing Measurements: A Revisited Method and Application toHubble Space Telescope Images , 1999, astro-ph/9905090.

[24]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Weak Lensing Analysis of Cl 1358+62 Using Hubble Space Telescope Observations , 1998 .

[25]  M. Kamionkowski,et al.  Theory and Statistics of Weak Lensing from Large-Scale Mass Inhomogeneities , 1997, astro-ph/9712030.

[26]  T. Broadhurst,et al.  A Method for Weak Lensing Observations , 1994, astro-ph/9411005.

[27]  A. Riess,et al.  Time Dependence of ACS WFC CTE Corrections for Photometry and Future Predictions , 2004 .

[28]  Richard N. Hook,et al.  MultiDrizzle: An Integrated Pyraf Script for Registering, Cleaning and Combining Images , 2003 .

[29]  P. Bristow,et al.  Modelling Charge Transfer on the STIS CCD , 2002 .