Enhancement and Resetting of Locomotor Activity by Muscle Afferentsa

Abstract: The generation of the normal motor pattern for walking in mammals requires feedback from muscle proprioceptors. Two characteristics of the motor pattern particularly dependent on proprioceptive signals are (1) the magnitude of activity in knee and ankle extensor muscles and (2) the duration of extensor bursts during stance. Sensory regulation of these characteristics ensures that the level of activity in extensor muscles during stance is appropriate for the load carried by the leg and that the swing phase is not initiated when a leg is loaded. Many different groups of afferents from flexor and extensor muscles can influence the locomotor pattern. Most attention has focused on the action of group I afferents from ankle extensors. Electrical stimulation of these afferents during extension increases the duration and the magnitude of extensor activity. The prolongation of extensor activity depends in part on excitation of the extensor half‐center by group Ib afferents from Golgi tendon organs. The enhancement of the magnitude of extensor bursts is produced primarily via disynaptic and polysynaptic pathways opened only during locomotion. The involvement of the proprioceptive signals in the generation of locomotor activity means that the gains in reflex pathways must be constantly calibrated according to the biomechanical properties of the locomotor system. Alteration of these properties by weakening ankle extensor muscles has recently been found to produce compensatory changes in proprioceptive influences on the locomotor pattern.

[1]  C. Sherrington Flexion‐reflex of the limb, crossed extension‐reflex, and reflex stepping and standing , 1910, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  M L Shik,et al.  [Work of muscle receptors during controlled locomotion]. , 1967, Biofizika.

[3]  M. Kumamoto,et al.  Electromyographic study of the learning process of walking in infants. , 1972, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Rossignol,et al.  On the initiation of the swing phase of locomotion in chronic spinal cats , 1978, Brain Research.

[5]  V. Dietz,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of human locomotion. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  K. Pearson,et al.  Inhibition of flexor burst generation by loading ankle extensor muscles in walking cats , 1980, Brain Research.

[7]  S. Grillner,et al.  Peripheral control of the cat's step cycle. I. Phase dependent effects of ramp-movements of the hip during "fictive locomotion". , 1981, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  S. Grillner,et al.  Peripheral control of the cat's step cycle. II. Entrainment of the central pattern generators for locomotion by sinusoidal hip movements during "fictive locomotion.". , 1983, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  S. Grillner,et al.  The effect of dorsal root transection on the efferent motor pattern in the cat's hindlimb during locomotion. , 1984, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[10]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Tendon organ firing during active muscle lengthening in awake, normally behaving cats. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  M. Hulliger,et al.  Ensemble proprioceptive activity in the cat step cycle: towards a representative look-up chart. , 1989, Progress in brain research.

[12]  K. Pearson,et al.  Reversal of the influence of group Ib afferents from plantaris on activity in medial gastrocnemius muscle during locomotor activity. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D J Kriellaars,et al.  Mechanical entrainment of fictive locomotion in the decerebrate cat. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Gorassini,et al.  Corrective responses to loss of ground support during walking. I. Intact cats. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  K. Pearson,et al.  Corrective responses to loss of ground support during walking. II. Comparison of intact and chronic spinal cats. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  D A McCrea,et al.  Disynaptic group I excitation of synergist ankle extensor motoneurones during fictive locomotion in the cat. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  K. Pearson Proprioceptive regulation of locomotion , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  K. Pearson,et al.  Plasticity of the extensor group I pathway controlling the stance to swing transition in the cat. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. McCrea,et al.  Ankle extensor group I afferents excite extensors throughout the hindlimb during fictive locomotion in the cat. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  D. McCrea,et al.  Group I extensor afferents evoke disynaptic EPSPs in cat hindlimb extensor motorneurones during fictive locomotion. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  L. Rowell,et al.  Exercise : regulation and integration of multiple systems , 1996 .

[22]  K. Pearson,et al.  Contribution of hind limb flexor muscle afferents to the timing of phase transitions in the cat step cycle. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. Coast Handbook of Physiology. Section 12. Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems , 1997 .

[24]  K. Pearson,et al.  Modification of group I field potentials in the intermediate nucleus of the cat spinal cord after chronic axotomy of an extensor nerve , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  K. Pearson,et al.  Plasticity in reflex pathways controlling stepping in the cat. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Implications of positive feedback in the control of movement. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Positive force feedback control of muscles. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  K. Pearson,et al.  Contribution of sensory feedback to the generation of extensor activity during walking in the decerebrate Cat. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.