Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations.

Two studies were conducted to examine the implications of an apology versus a denial for repairing trust after an alleged violation. Results reveal that trust was repaired more successfully when mistrusted parties (a) apologized for violations concerning matters of competence but denied culpability for violations concerning matters of integrity, and (b) had apologized for violations when there was subsequent evidence of guilt but had denied culpability for violations when there was subsequent evidence of innocence. Supplementary analyses also revealed that the interactive effects of violation type and violation response on participants' trusting intentions were mediated by their trusting beliefs. Combined, these findings provide needed insight and supporting evidence concerning how trust might be repaired in the aftermath of a violation.

[1]  H. W. Kee,et al.  Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion , 1970 .

[2]  Thomas R. Kane,et al.  The effects of post‐transgression remorse on perceived aggression, attributions of intent, and level of punishment , 1978 .

[3]  M. Brewer,et al.  A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. , 1979 .

[4]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[5]  B. R. Schlenker Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[6]  R E Wood,et al.  Manager behavior in a social context: the impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions. , 1981, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[7]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[8]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  The Effectiveness of Accounts Following Transgression , 1983 .

[9]  D. H. Mills The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[10]  John K. Butler,et al.  A Behavioral Decision Theory Approach to Modeling Dyadic Trust in Superiors and Subordinates , 1984 .

[11]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  M. Coovert,et al.  Revising an Impression of Morality , 1986 .

[14]  Irving M. Lane,et al.  A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water , 1988 .

[15]  Louis M. Hsu,et al.  Factors Affecting Perceptions of Political Candidates Accused of Sexual and Financial Misconduct , 1988 .

[16]  J. Hennart,et al.  Upstream vertical integration in the aluminum and tin industries : A comparative study of the choice between market and intrafirm coordination , 1988 .

[17]  David R. Shaffer,et al.  On testifying in one's own behalf: Interactive effects of evidential strength and defendant's testimonial demeanor on mock jurors' decisions. , 1989 .

[18]  K. Ohbuchi,et al.  Apology as aggression control: its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  E F Loftus,et al.  Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Defensive Behavior in Organizations: A Preliminary Model , 1990 .

[21]  Paul L. Schindler,et al.  The Structure of Interpersonal Trust in the Workplace , 1993 .

[22]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[23]  S. Ceci,et al.  Unconscious transference and mistaken identity: When a witness misidentifies a familiar but innocent person. , 1994 .

[24]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[25]  The self-comparison process and self-discrepant feedback: consequences of learning you are what you thought you were not. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm , 1994 .

[27]  C. Stevens,et al.  Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. , 1995 .

[28]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[29]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. , 1995 .

[30]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[31]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[32]  J. Crant,et al.  Doing More Harm Than Good: When Is Impression Management Likely to Evoke a Negative Response? , 1996 .

[33]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[34]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Social Perception, Social Stereotypes, and Teacher Expectations: Accuracy and the Quest for the Powerful Self-Fulfilling Prophecy , 1996 .

[35]  J. Eccles,et al.  In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[37]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[38]  J. H. Davis,et al.  The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .

[39]  Arthur A. Stukas,et al.  Interpersonal processes: the interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[40]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  Bottom‐up versus top‐down evaluations of candidates' managerial potential: An experimental study , 1999 .

[42]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Forming Impressions of Political Leaders: A Cross‐National Comparison , 1999 .

[43]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust, trust development, and trust repair. , 2000 .

[44]  Peter T. Coleman,et al.  The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[45]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Organizational Research , 2001 .

[46]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Steven E. Daniels,et al.  When Talk Is Not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[48]  P. Kim,et al.  Flattery May Get You Somewhere: The Strategic Implications of Providing Positive vs. Negative Feedback About Ability vs. Ethicality in Negotiation , 2003 .