Efficacy of methotrexate treatment in patients with probable rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA; inflammatory, nontraumatic arthritis that cannot be diagnosed using current classification criteria) benefit from treatment with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS The PRObable rheumatoid arthritis: Methotrexate versus Placebo Treatment (PROMPT) study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial involving 110 patients with UA who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1958 criteria for probable RA. Treatment started with MTX (15 mg/week) or placebo tablets, and every 3 months the dosage was increased if the Disease Activity Score was >2.4. After 12 months, the study medication was tapered and discontinued. Patients were followed up for 30 months. When a patient fulfilled the ACR criteria for RA (primary end point), the study medication was changed to MTX. Joint damage was scored on radiographs of the hands and feet. RESULTS In 22 of the 55 patients (40%) in the MTX group, UA progressed to RA compared with 29 of 55 patients (53%) in the placebo group. However, in the MTX group, patients fulfilled the ACR criteria for RA at a later time point than in the placebo group (P = 0.04), and fewer patients showed radiographic progression over 18 months (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION This study provides evidence for the efficacy of MTX treatment in postponing the diagnosis of RA, as defined by the ACR 1987 criteria, and retarding radiographic joint damage in UA patients.

[1]  G. A. Bennett,et al.  1958 revision of diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. , 1958, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  Saskia le Cessie,et al.  A prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis: how to guide individual treatment decisions. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  S. Cessie,et al.  Comparison of long term outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis presenting with undifferentiated arthritis or with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational cohort study , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  B. Dijkmans,et al.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  A. Cats,et al.  Measurement of disability in Dutch rheumatoid arthritis patients , 1984, Clinical Rheumatology.

[7]  C. Allaart,et al.  Undifferentiated arthritis--disease course assessed in several inception cohorts. , 2004, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[8]  F. Breedveld,et al.  Autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides predict progression to rheumatoid arthritis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis: a prospective cohort study. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  B. Dijkmans,et al.  Specific autoantibodies precede the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: a study of serial measurements in blood donors. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  V. Holers,et al.  Can we accurately predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis in the preclinical phase? , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  Rene Westhovens,et al.  COBRA combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: long-term structural benefits of a brief intervention. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Early versus delayed treatment in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of two cohorts who received different treatment strategies. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[13]  P. Shekelle,et al.  How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. , 1999 .

[14]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[15]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis , 1997, The Lancet.

[16]  Désirée van der Heijde,et al.  Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability. , 1996 .

[17]  A. van der Heide,et al.  The Effectiveness of Early Treatment with Second-Line Antirheumatic Drugs , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability. , 1996, Bailliere's clinical rheumatology.

[19]  M. Prevoo,et al.  Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. , 1996, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  F. Wolfe,et al.  Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. A five-year prospective multicenter study. , 1994, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  P. Hannonen,et al.  Sulfasalazine in early rheumatoid arthritis. A 48-week double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled study. , 1993, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  van der Heijde Dm,et al.  Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. , 1993 .

[23]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[24]  J. Kremer,et al.  Long-term prospective study of the use of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Update after a mean of 90 months. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[25]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. , 1990, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[26]  F. Arnett Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[27]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  G. A. Bennett,et al.  1958 Revision of diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. , 1959, Bulletin on the rheumatic diseases.