Geometric reasoning for manufacturability evaluation--application to powder metallurgy

Abstract A new approach to perform geometric reasoning for manufacturability evaluation is developed using three-dimensional objects that are based on a process-dependent geometric model. It is demonstrated that by incorporating the limitations of the process directly in the geometric representation scheme, the task of manufacturability evaluation becomes straightforward and can be performed without either feature extraction or designing with features. The new approach is illustrated for the cold die compaction of powdered metals (PM). The geometric model for PM consists of a set of fundamental three-dimensional manufacturable entities, plates, blind cavities, and through cavities, all of arbitrary shape. The new approach is further enhanced by using a single, compact data structure that captures the shape characteristics to fully define the PM parts, and to support the reasoning required for manufacturability evaluation. Using this approach provides the ability to perform geometric reasoning easily that: (1) determines a part's orientation and tooling; (2) identifies sharp corners, feathered edges, thin walls, grooves, shelves, and notches, and other part attributes that adversely affect die fill, tooling cost and life, part integrity, and density control; and (3) automatically adds fillets, chamfers, edge rounds, tapers, and axial flats, which are common to PM parts. Furthermore, the reasoning is performed using a small set of algorithms to manipulate the appropriate information in the data structure, and is sufficiently robust to account for all practical shapes. The close coupling of the data structure and the algorithms permits the evaluation and modifications to take only a few seconds on a 486-based personal computer, and therefore, are performed in real time as the parts are created.

[1]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Advances in Feature-Based Manufacturing , 1994 .

[2]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Feature Recognition for Manufacturability Analysis , 1994 .

[3]  Wayne Tiller,et al.  Offsets of Two-Dimensional Profiles , 1984, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[4]  John Woodwark,et al.  Geometric Reasoning , 1989 .

[5]  Jaw Hans Hijink,et al.  Discrete part design by taking manufacturing restrictions into account , 1991 .

[6]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Design for forming and other near net shape manufacturing processes , 1990 .

[7]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  A Testbed For Rapid Prototyping Of Feature Based Applications , 1994 .

[8]  Yong Se Kim,et al.  Geometric reasoning for machining features using convex decomposition , 1993, Comput. Aided Des..

[9]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  Feature-based modeling for mechanical design , 1990, Comput. Graph..

[10]  K. G. Swift,et al.  Geometric reasoning and design for manufacture , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[11]  A. de Pennington,et al.  Geometric Reasoning Based on Graph Grammar Parsing , 1994 .

[12]  M. J. Wozny,et al.  Topics In Feature-Based Design And Manufacturing , 1994 .

[13]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Geometric Reasoning for Extraction of Manufacturing Features in Iso-Oriented Polyhedrons , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  R. Allen Miller,et al.  Spatial reasoning on form feature interactions for manufacturability assessment , 1992 .

[15]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  A methodology and computational framework for concurrent product and process design , 1990 .

[16]  D. C. Anderson,et al.  Geometric reasoning in feature-based design and process planning , 1990, Comput. Graph..

[17]  Shinji Mukai,et al.  An algorithm for deciding similarities of convex polyhedra , 1994, Comput. Graph..