The “50-50 Criteria” on Postoperative Day 5: An Accurate Predictor of Liver Failure and Death After Hepatectomy

Objective:To standardize the definition of postoperative liver failure (PLF) for prediction of early mortality after hepatectomy. Summary Background Data:The definition of PLF is not standardized, making the comparison of innovations in surgical techniques and the timely use of specific therapeutic interventions complex. Methods:Between 1998 and 2002, 775 elective liver resections, including 69% for malignancies and 60% major resections, were included in a prospective database. The nontumorous liver was abnormal in 43% with steatosis >30% in 14%, noncirrhotic fibrosis in 43%, and cirrhosis in 12%. The impact of prothrombin time (PT) <50% and serum bilirubin (SB) >50 &mgr;mol/L on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7 was analyzed. Results:The lowest PT level was observed on postoperative day (POD) 1, while the peak of SB was observed on POD 3. These 2 variables tended to return to preoperative values by POD 5. The median interval between hepatectomy and postoperative death was 15 days (range, 5–39 days). Postoperative mortality significantly increased in patients with PT <50% and SB >50 &mgr;ml/L. The conjunction of PT <50% and SB >50 &mgr;mol/L on POD 5 was a strong predictive factor of mortality. In patients with significant morbidity, this “50-50 criteria” was met 3 to 8 days before clinical evidence of complications. Conclusions:The association of PT <50% and SB >50 &mgr;ml/L on POD 5 (the 50-50 criteria) was a simple, early, and accurate predictor of more than 50% mortality rate after hepatectomy. This criteria could be identified early enough, before clinical evidence of complications, for specific interventions to be applied in due time.

[1]  D. Valla,et al.  Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. , 2005, Journal of hepatology.

[2]  S J Wigmore,et al.  The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection , 2005, Gut.

[3]  R. Jalan,et al.  PROSPECTS FOR EXTRACORPOREAL LIVER SUPPORT , 2004, Gut.

[4]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[5]  E. Abdalla,et al.  The small remnant liver after major liver resection: How common and how relevant? , 2003, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[6]  Chi-Chih Wang,et al.  Stress Response to Hepatectomy in Patients with a Healthy or a Diseased Liver , 2003, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  J. Vauthey,et al.  Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization for Extended Hepatectomy , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[8]  V. Vilgrain,et al.  Portal Vein Embolization Before Right Hepatectomy: Prospective Clinical Trial , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[9]  Yuman Fong,et al.  Improvement in Perioperative Outcome After Hepatic Resection: Analysis of 1,803 Consecutive Cases Over the Past Decade , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[10]  Michael A. Choti,et al.  Trends in Long-Term Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[11]  M. Navasa Bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis: reasons, comments and suggestions. , 2001, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[12]  H. Bismuth,et al.  Percutaneous Portal Vein Embolization Increases the Feasibility and Safety of Major Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Injured Liver , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[13]  O. Farges,et al.  Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  K. Do,et al.  Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: methodology and clinical associations. , 2000, Surgery.

[15]  T. Utsunomiya,et al.  Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  S. Fan,et al.  Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: toward zero hospital deaths. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[17]  J. Ludwig,et al.  Hepatic steatosis as a potential risk factor for major hepatic resection , 1998, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[18]  J. Reichen,et al.  Hepatectomy: Preoperative Analysis of Hepatic Function and Postoperative Liver Failure , 1998, Digestive Surgery.

[19]  F. Schildberg,et al.  Preoperative Risk Assessment of Hepatic Resection for Malignant Disease , 1997, World Journal of Surgery.

[20]  S. Fan,et al.  Perioperative nutritional support in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  J. Belghiti,et al.  ‘Natural history’ of hepatectomy , 1992, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  Measurement of liver volume and hepatic functional reserve as a guide to decision‐making in resectional surgery for hepatic tumors , 1997, Hepatology.

[23]  C. G. Child,et al.  Surgery and portal hypertension. , 1964, Major problems in clinical surgery.