How older adults meet complexity: Aging effects on the usability of different mobile phones

In this experiment, older and younger novice mobile phone users were examined when using handsets of different complexity. The independent variables were user age (young: 20 – 35 years; old: 50 – 64 years) and cognitive complexity of two mobile phones (Nokia 3210; Siemens C35i). The cognitive complexity of the phones was defined by the number of production rules applied when processing the four experimental tasks. Dependent variables were effectiveness and efficiency as taken from user protocols and the reported ease of use. The less complex phone (Nokia) performed significantly better than the complex one (Siemens). However, the benefit from the lower complexity was much larger than theoretically predicted. Thus, defining cognitive complexity of technical devices by the number of production rules does not account for the real difficulties which users experience. Older users had a lower navigation performance than younger users, however their performance matched younger users' when using mobiles with low complexity.

[1]  Steve J. Westerman,et al.  Individual Differences in the Use of Command Line and Menu Computer Interfaces , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  D. B. Mitchell,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 2001 .

[3]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  Reasoning and spatial abilities. , 1992 .

[4]  K. Schaie,et al.  Training the elderly on the ability factors of spatial orientation and inductive reasoning. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[5]  David G. Curry.  In-Vehicle Cell Phones: Fatal Distraction—Yes or No? , 2001 .

[6]  W. Rogers,et al.  The Use of Communication Technologies by Older Adults: Exploring the Benefits from the User's Perspective , 2001 .

[7]  Dyi-Yih Michael Lin,et al.  Age Differences in the Performance of Hypertext Perusal , 2001 .

[8]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Mental Models of a Cellular Phone Menu. Comparing Older and Younger Novice Users , 2004, Mobile HCI.

[9]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Universal Access in HCI , 2001 .

[10]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Aging, Visual Performance and Eyestrain in Different Screen Technologies , 2001 .

[11]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Children Using Cellular Phones: The Effects of Shortcomings in User Interface Design , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Effects of Menu Foresight on Information Access in Small Screen Devices , 2004 .

[13]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[14]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  On keys' meanings and modes: the impact of different key solutions on children's efficiency using a mobile phone , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[16]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Jacqueline Brodie,et al.  How age can inform the future design of the mobile phone experience , 2003 .

[18]  R. Pak.  A Further Examination of the Influence of Spatial Abilities on Computer Task Performance in Younger and Older Adults , 2001 .

[19]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .

[20]  Kent L. Norman.  Spatial Visualization—A Gateway to Computer-Based Technology , 1994 .

[21]  R C Williges,et al.  Assaying and Isolating Individual Differences in Searching a Hierarchical File System , 1987, Human factors.

[22]  Neil Charness,et al.  Issues in training older adults to use computers , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[23]  David E. Kieras,et al.  An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity , 1999, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[24]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing The User Interface , 2013 .

[25]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[26]  Hanhwe Kim,et al.  Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..