Reframing the principle of specialisation in legitimation code theory: A blended learning perspective

This study argues that in developing a robust framework for students in a blended learning environment, Structural Alignment (SA) becomes the third principle of specialisation in addition to Epistemic Relation (ER) and Social Relation (SR). We provide an extended code: (ER+/−, SR+/−, SA+/−) that present strong classification and framing to the architecture of blended learning while defining the impact of structural alignment in the trajectory. The subjects in this study were 500 undergraduate students drawn from three faculties in a university. Using a Structural Equation Model (SEM), we show that SR, ER and SA redefine the principle of specialisation in Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) which is necessary in enhancing blended learning. We conclude that whereas epistemic and social relations define the knower and knowledge code, structural alignment explains the infrastructure and policy framework that supports knowledge acquisition in a blended learning environment.

[1]  Wen-Shan Lin,et al.  Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Karl Maton,et al.  Disciplinarity : functional linguistic and sociological perspectives , 2011 .

[3]  Charles R. Graham BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005 .

[4]  B. Bernstein Vertical and Horizontal Discourse: An essay , 1999 .

[5]  C. Dziuban,et al.  Blended learning: A dangerous idea? , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[6]  D. Garrison,et al.  Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  Sean B. Eom,et al.  The Determinants of Students' Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation* , 2006 .

[8]  Janet Macdonald Blended Learning and Online Tutoring: Planning Learner Support and Activity Design , 2008 .

[9]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[10]  Terry Anderson,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Online Learning , 2009 .

[11]  Laura Czerniewicz Educational technology - mapping the terrain with Bernstein as cartographer , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs , 2005 .

[13]  Soongoo Hong,et al.  An enterprise-wide knowledge management system infrastructure , 2002, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[14]  Deryn Watson,et al.  Pedagogy before Technology: Re-thinking the Relationship between ICT and Teaching , 2001, Education and Information Technologies.

[15]  Karl Maton,et al.  Social realism, knowledge and the sociology of education : coalitions of the mind , 2010 .

[16]  Richard Edwards,et al.  Performative ontologies: Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning , 2013 .

[17]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[18]  A. Kavoura,et al.  Qualitative Communication Research Methods and Techniques , 2015 .

[19]  Mohamed Ally,et al.  FOUNDATIONS OF EDUCATIONAL THEORY FOR ONL INE LEARNING , 2004 .

[20]  S. M. Lee,et al.  Blended learning and online tutoring , 2009 .

[21]  Leesa Wheelahan How competency‐based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: a modified Bernsteinian analysis , 2007 .

[22]  G. McPhail Book Review Maton, K. (2013). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London & New York: Routledge , 2014 .

[23]  S. Howard,et al.  Theorising knowledge practices: a missing piece of the educational technology puzzle , 2011 .

[24]  Diane Newton,et al.  Beyond blended learning: A case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[25]  K. Maton Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education , 2013 .

[26]  M. Young Conceptualizing vocational knowledge : Some theoretical considerations , 2004 .

[27]  D. Bolliger,et al.  Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education , 2009 .

[28]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended Learning Environments: Definitions and Directions. , 2003 .

[30]  C. Fornell,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics , 1981 .

[31]  J. Muller Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence , 2009 .

[32]  J. Grix Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research , 2002 .

[33]  SunPei-Chen,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008 .

[34]  Daniel J. Marcucci Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, & Keith Morrison (2011). Research methods in education (7a ed.). New York: Routledge. , 2011 .

[35]  K. Bailey Methods of Social Research , 1978 .

[36]  David Gefen,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000 .

[37]  Mary Keeffe,et al.  Self‐determined blended learning: a case study of blended learning design , 2010 .

[38]  Sean B. Eom,et al.  The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Update* , 2016 .

[39]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  New Technology and Learning: Policy and Practice in the UK, 1980–2010 , 2000, Education and Information Technologies.

[40]  Saiful Nizam Warris,et al.  BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION : AN OVERVIEW * , 2016 .

[41]  Charles R. Graham Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning , 2012 .

[42]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[43]  Sevgi Özkan,et al.  Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[44]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[45]  LiawShu-Sheng Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning , 2008 .

[46]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[47]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[48]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[49]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[50]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[51]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[52]  D. Ketchen A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2013 .

[53]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  Asynchronous & Synchronous E-Learning , 2008 .

[54]  Michael Young,et al.  Knowledge, Curriculum and Qualifications for South African Further Education , 2006 .

[55]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  A theory of online learning as online participation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[57]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Jim Clark Stimulating collaboration and discussion in online learning environments , 2001 .

[59]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[60]  Karen Swan,et al.  Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: An application of Grice's cooperative principle , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[61]  E. Bulut,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in Investigating the Relationship between Leadership, Motivation and Rewarding , 2015 .

[62]  H. Selim E-learning critical success factors: an exploratory investigation of student perceptions , 2007 .

[63]  Hager Khechine,et al.  Student behavioural intentions to use desktop video conferencing in a distance course: integration of autonomy to the UTAUT model , 2013, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[64]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[65]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[66]  D. Garrison,et al.  The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. , 2008 .

[67]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[68]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[69]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[70]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States. , 2014 .

[71]  Fernando Alonso,et al.  An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[72]  Ana Remesal,et al.  Social presence and online collaborative small group work: A socioconstructivist account , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[73]  Elizabeth Rata The Politics of Knowledge in Education , 2012 .

[74]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning , 2008 .