Prediction and analysis of excitation sources of car booming noise through a Bayesian meta-model

Abstract Current approaches in the automotive domain to predict booming noise essentially target extreme loading conditions. This is useful when mechanical strength is of concern, but not representative of the actual vehicle usage. Usage is however important when addressing acoustic annoyance. One issue in this respect is the lack of databases representative of the diversity of client usages and, therefore, of the excitation forces applied to the vehicle in real usage conditions. This paper introduces a possible answer to this problem. First, it proposes a measurement protocol to estimate the excitation forces in real usage responsible of booming noise. Second, it provides an array of algorithms to analyze the large amount of data collected during the measurement step. In particular, an ad hoc Independent Component Analysis algorithm is introduced to extract excitation components specific to well-defined operating condition regions, thus providing insights in the excitation behaviour, as well as data reduction. Next, the excitation components are modelled as a function of the vehicle operating conditions with a Radial Basis Function network. A meta-model of the excitations in real usage conditions is thus obtained, composed of two levels: the analysis level and the modelling level. The proposed methodology is developed in the Bayesian framework. In addition to its advantages linked to the trivial introduction of prior knowledge, the Bayesian framework is found particularly useful for propagating uncertainties throughout the successive steps of the approach.

[1]  C. Robert,et al.  Understanding Computational Bayesian Statistics , 2009 .

[2]  Daniel Rixen,et al.  General framework for transfer path analysis: History, theory and classification of techniques $ , 2016 .

[3]  Arnaud Gaudin,et al.  Low frequency road noise decomposition at wheel center on an roller bench , 2012 .

[4]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[5]  David Thompson,et al.  The Quantification of Structure-Borne Transmission Paths by Inverse Methods - Part 2: Use of Regularization Techniques , 2003 .

[6]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[7]  A. Mohammad-Djafari A Bayesian approach to source separation , 2000, math-ph/0008025.

[8]  Christian Soize,et al.  Structural-acoustic modeling of automotive vehicles in presence of uncertainties and experimental identification and validation. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. W. Verheij,et al.  Reciprocity method for the measurement of mechano-acoustical transfer functions , 1975 .

[10]  Andy Moorhouse,et al.  In situ measurement of the blocked force of structure-borne sound sources , 2009 .

[11]  A. Carrella Nonlinear identifications using transmissibility: Dynamic characterisation of Anti Vibration Mounts (AVMs) with standard approach and nonlinear analysis , 2012 .

[12]  J. Antoni Blind separation of vibration components: Principles and demonstrations , 2005 .

[13]  Cédric Févotte Bayesian Audio Source Separation , 2007, Blind Speech Separation.

[14]  At Moorhouse,et al.  In-situ source path contribution analysis of structure borne road noise , 2013 .

[15]  N. Lalor,et al.  The prediction of low- and mid-frequency internal road vehicle noise: A literature survey , 2007 .

[16]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  M. V. van der Seijs,et al.  Validation of Blocked-Force Transfer Path Analysis with Compensation for Test Bench Dynamics , 2014 .

[18]  D. Broomhead,et al.  Radial Basis Functions, Multi-Variable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks , 1988 .

[19]  Nagi G. Naganathan,et al.  A literature review of automotive vehicle engine mounting systems , 2001 .

[20]  David Thompson,et al.  The quantification of structure-borne transmission paths by inverse methods. Part 1: Improved singular value rejection methods , 2003 .

[21]  Sung-Hwan Shin,et al.  Sound quality evaluation of the booming sensation for passenger cars , 2009 .

[22]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  A study and extension of second-order blind source separation to operational modal analysis , 2013 .

[23]  Palle Andersen,et al.  Modal parameter identification based on combining transmissibility functions and blind source separation techniques , 2018 .

[24]  John Moody,et al.  Fast Learning in Networks of Locally-Tuned Processing Units , 1989, Neural Computation.

[25]  Gerhard E. Thien,et al.  A Review of Parameters Affecting the Noise and Vibration in Diesel Powered Passenger Cars , 1985 .

[26]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[27]  N. Saito The Generalized Spike Process, Sparsity, and Statistical Independence , 2001, math/0110103.

[28]  Radford M. Neal Slice Sampling , 2003, The Annals of Statistics.

[29]  Te-Won Lee,et al.  Multivariate Scale Mixture of Gaussians Modeling , 2006, ICA.

[30]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[31]  S.-K. Lee,et al.  The application of artificial neural networks to the characterization of interior noise booming in passenger cars , 2004 .

[32]  Daniela Calvetti,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian Scientific Computing: Ten Lectures on Subjective Computing , 2007 .

[33]  J. Cardoso,et al.  Blind beamforming for non-gaussian signals , 1993 .

[34]  Wei Feng,et al.  Time domain force localization and reconstruction based on hierarchical Bayesian method , 2020 .

[35]  E. Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2013 .

[36]  M. Aucejo,et al.  On a full Bayesian inference for force reconstruction problems , 2018 .