Gene flow of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) according to isolation distance and buffer zone

The introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops in the EU has raised questions concerning gene dispersal and coexistence with non-GM-farming. Quantitative estimates of the gene dispersal from fields with GM-crops to fields with conspecific non-GM-crops (conventional or organic) are therefore needed in order to suggest isolation distances and other management strategies to keep GM-pollination below acceptable threshold values. A meta-analysis of available gene-flow data for oilseed rape (Brassica napus) was performed. The probability distribution that seeds of non-GM-oilseed rape are fertilised by foreign pollen grains from a neighbouring field of GM-oilseed rape is modelled as functions of the width of the recipient (i.e. pollen receiving) field and the distance to the pollen donor fields. Furthermore, the significance of using a buffer zone (removal of a 1‐5 m border of a recipient field parallel to the pollen donor field) to reduce GM-pollination of the crop, is quantified and discussed. The predicted median and 95% credibility level of the probability of foreign pollination is calculated as a function of the width of the recipient field and the buffer zone, as well as the distance between fields. Analysis of different management strategies shows that an increasing isolation distance is more effective to reduce GM-pollen dispersal than the use of a buffer zone, especially for small recipient fields. The analysis shows that increasing the width of a recipient oilseed rape field, relative to the pollen donor field, will have a large effect on reducing the average level of fertilisation by foreign pollen within the recipient field. The results indicate that a GM-pollination percentage <0.1% will be possible if the isolation distance exceeds 100 m and the width of the non-GM-field is larger than 200 m. If a threshold value of 0.3% is acceptable, an isolation distance of 50 m should be sufficient even for smaller fields. The use of a 5 m discarded buffer zone surrounding the non-GM-field is expected to reduce GM-pollination by about a third. The implications of the results for field management in conventional and organic farming are discussed. # 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Assessing the risks of wind pollination from fields of genetically modified Brassica napus ssp. oleifera , 1995, Euphytica.

[2]  Euan Simpson,et al.  Assessing the impact and consequences of the release and commercialisation of genetically modified crops , 1999 .

[3]  J. Ingram,et al.  The separation distances required to ensure cross-pollination is below specified limits in non-seed crops of sugar beet, maize and oilseed rape. , 2000 .

[4]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[5]  W. Stiekema,et al.  Aspects of the biosafety of transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus Q , 1997 .

[6]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Pollen-Mediated Movement of Herbicide Resistance Between Commercial Canola Fields , 2002, Science.

[7]  Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer , 2002 .

[8]  B. Godelle,et al.  A pollen-dispersal experiment with transgenic oilseed rape. Estimation of the average pollen dispersal of an individual plant within a field , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[9]  A. M. Timmons,et al.  Problems of risk assessment with genetically modified oilseed rape. , 1995 .

[10]  Thijs F. M. Etty Genetically Modified Organisms on the EU Internal Market and in the Dutch Environment: An Overview of the Legal Framework for Deliberate Release of GMOs (in Dutch) , 2006 .

[11]  R. Downey Gene flow and rape - the Canadian experience , 1999 .

[12]  L. Westcott,et al.  Canola pollination: an update , 2001 .

[13]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  GENE FLOW IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS OF HERBICIDE‐RESISTANT CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS) , 2003 .

[14]  P. McVetty,et al.  Effectiveness of border areas in confining the spread of transgenic Brassica napus pollen , 2000 .

[15]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  GENESYS : a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. I. Temporal evolution of a population of rapeseed volunteers in a field , 2001 .

[16]  C. Damgaard,et al.  Environmental variation for outcrossing rate in rapeseed (Brassica napus) , 1992, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[17]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Management of transgenic crops within the cropping system , 1999 .

[18]  Mark Kot,et al.  Dispersal and Pattern Formation in a Discrete-Time Predator-Prey Model , 1995 .

[19]  S. Mikkelsen,et al.  Supplementary Report from the Danish Working Group on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops: update of the 2003 Report. , 2007 .

[20]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  GeneSys: a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers: II. Genetic exchanges among volunteer and cropped populations in a small region , 2001 .

[21]  P. Walklate,et al.  A model of pollen–mediated gene flow for oilseed rape , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  Impact of herbicide-resistant crops as weeds in Canada. , 2001 .

[23]  Colin Rose,et al.  Mathematical Statistics with Mathematica , 2002 .

[24]  Philip J. Dale,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of isolation distances for field plots of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) using a herbicide‐resistance transgene as a selectable marker , 1995 .

[25]  William F. Morris,et al.  Do Barren Zones and Pollen Traps Reduce Gene Escape From Transgenic Crops , 1994 .