MR diffusion-weighted imaging and outcome prediction after ischemic stroke

Background: MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) shows acute ischemic lesions early after stroke so it might improve outcome prediction and reduce sample sizes in stroke treatment trials. Previous studies of DWI and outcome produced conflicting results. Objective: To determine whether DWI lesion characteristics independently predict outcome in a broad range of patients with acute stroke. Methods: The authors recruited hospital-admitted patients with all severities of suspected stroke, assessed stroke severity on the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), performed early brain DWI, and assessed outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale). Clinical data and DWI lesion parameters were evaluated in a logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of outcome at 3 months and a previously described “Three-Item Scale” (including DWI) was tested for outcome prediction. Results: Among 82 patients (mean NIHSS 7.1 [±6.3 SD]), the only independent outcome predictors were age and stroke severity. Neither DWI lesion volume nor apparent diffusion coefficient nor the previously described Three-Item Scale predicted outcome independently. Comparison with previous studies suggested that DWI may predict outcome only in patients with more severe cortical ischemic strokes. Conclusions: Across a broad range of stroke severities, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) did not predict outcome beyond that of key clinical variables. Thus, DWI is unlikely to reduce sample sizes in acute stroke trials assessing functional outcome, especially where estimated treatment effects are modest.

[1]  S M Davis,et al.  Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI , 1998, Neurology.

[2]  W Hacke,et al.  Stroke magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours after onset of hyperacute cerebral ischemia , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[3]  W. Mali,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke. , 1998, Stroke.

[4]  G. Lenzi,et al.  Is visible infarction on computed tomography associated with an adverse prognosis in acute ischemic stroke? , 1998, Stroke.

[5]  R. Bloch,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.

[6]  W R Clarke,et al.  Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke , 1999, Neurology.

[7]  Jens Fiehler Editorial comment--ADC and metabolites in stroke: even more confusion about diffusion? , 2003, Stroke.

[8]  Brian Silver,et al.  A three-item scale for the early prediction of stroke recovery , 2001, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Dennis,et al.  Systematic Review of Prognostic Models in Patients with Acute Stroke , 2001, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[10]  S. Warach,et al.  Effect of citicoline on ischemic lesions as measured by diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2000 .

[11]  D. DeLong,et al.  Infarct Volume on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps Correlates with Length of Stay and Outcome after Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke , 2003, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[12]  J. Bamford,et al.  Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction , 1991, The Lancet.

[13]  Gunnar B. Stickler,et al.  Prognosis , 1970 .

[14]  M. Bastin,et al.  Is diffusion imaging appearance an independent predictor of outcome after ischemic stroke? , 2002, Neurology.

[15]  R R Edelman,et al.  Clinical Outcome in Ischemic Stroke Predicted by Early Diffusion-Weighted and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Preliminary Analysis , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[16]  M E Moseley,et al.  Is Early Ischemic Lesion Volume on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging an Independent Predictor of Stroke Outcome?: A Multivariable Analysis , 2000, Stroke.

[17]  C. Warlow,et al.  Predicting Outcome After Acute and Subacute Stroke: Development and Validation of New Prognostic Models , 2002, Stroke.

[18]  J. Concato,et al.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of perfusion and diffusion in stroke: Evolution of lesion volume and correlation with clinical outcome , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[20]  Telephone Intervention With Family Caregivers of Stroke Survivors After Rehabilitation , 2002 .

[21]  G. Murray,et al.  Comparison of neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke prognosis. , 1996, Stroke.

[22]  J. De Keyser,et al.  Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials. , 1999, Stroke.

[23]  M. Rausch,et al.  The clinical significance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in infratentorial strokes , 2004, Neurology.

[24]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Commentary: Prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten? , 1995 .

[25]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Visible infarction on computed tomography is an independent predictor of poor functional outcome after stroke, and not of haemorrhagic transformation , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  S. Cramer,et al.  Entry Criteria and Baseline Characteristics Predict Outcome in Acute Stroke Trials , 2001, Stroke.

[27]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome , 1997, Annals of neurology.