Behavioral and Neural Evidence for Item-specific Performance Monitoring

How cognitive control is recruited and implemented has become a major focus of researchers in cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Current theories posit that cognitive control operates at the level of general rules—for example, in a Stroop task, “attend to the color of the stimulus.” Here we report behavioral evidence suggesting that cognitive control is implemented much more locally, operating at the level of specific stimuli appearing in a task block. In addition, we report neural evidence that many of the regions implicated in cognitive control on the Stroop task, including anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, operate at a local level.

[1]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[2]  A. Henik,et al.  Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[3]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. , 2001, Cerebral Cortex.

[4]  Bruce Milliken,et al.  Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  G. Logan,et al.  When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task , 1979 .

[7]  D. Algom,et al.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects. , 2003, Psychological review.

[8]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  James R. Schmidt,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[10]  S. Bunge.  How we use rules to select actions: A review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[12]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Error-likelihood prediction in the medial frontal cortex: a critical evaluation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Strategies in the color-word Stroop task , 1984 .

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  James R. Schmidt,et al.  The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  M. Posner.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention , 2020 .

[17]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Response Conflict : Effects of Response Modality and Processing Domain , 2022 .

[18]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Hebbian learning of cognitive control: dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. , 2008, Psychological review.

[19]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Cognitive control acts locally , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[22]  P. Merikle,et al.  Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[23]  E. Miller,et al.  Different time courses of learning-related activity in the prefrontal cortex and striatum , 2005, Nature.

[24]  Derek Besner,et al.  Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: a computational model. , 2007, Psychological review.

[25]  J. Bugg,et al.  List-wide control is not entirely elusive: Evidence from picture–word Stroop , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Conflict monitoring: computational and empirical studies , 2004 .

[27]  D. Lowe,et al.  Selective and divided Attention in a Stroop task. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.