Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: the confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology

Effortstounderstandthestructureoftheemergingknowledgeeconomyhavepaid particular attention to the shifting boundary between academic and commercial (for-profit) research, especially in life sciences. Yet, empirical studies have tended to adopt a segmented approach, focusing on either industry or the academy, thus obscuring the increasingly interwoven nature of these two domains. In this paper, we explore the changing organizational logics that govern both academic and corporate science, using interview data gathered from two important clusters of the biotechnology industry: Route 128 in Massachusetts and the San Francisco Bay area. These data, while provisional, lead us to suggest that cultural traffic between university and commercial science has increased, blurring the boundary between them and generating a new and often contradictory knowledge regime,the product ofa growingconfluence oforganizational logics that had previously been distinct. The emergence of this regime, which conforms to Stark’s (2001) notion of ‘heterarchy’, holds important implications for prevailing theories of university‐industry relations and of organizational change as well.

[1]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[2]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  View from the Bench: Patents and Material Transfers , 2005, Science.

[3]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[5]  Mary L. Fennell,et al.  The Changing Organizational Context of Professional Work , 1997 .

[6]  Steven P. Vallas,et al.  Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “knowledge worker”: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States , 2001 .

[7]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[8]  Steven P. Vallas,et al.  Why Teamwork Fails: Obstacles to Workplace Change in Four Manufacturing Plants , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[9]  S. Barley.  Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .

[10]  J. Thomson.  Academic Freedom and Tenure: Corporate Funding of Academic Research. , 1983 .

[11]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences , 1998 .

[12]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[13]  W. Powell,et al.  The Knowledge Economy , 2004 .

[14]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[15]  Edward J. Hackett,et al.  Essential Tensions , 2005 .

[16]  D. Light.  Institutional change and healthcare organizations: from professional dominance to managed care , 2002, International Journal of Integrated Care.

[17]  L. Vaccarezza.  The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[18]  Ian Hacking,et al.  A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. , 1995 .

[19]  Viviana A. Zelizer,et al.  The Purchase of Intimacy , 2000, Law & Social Inquiry.

[20]  M. Burawoy.  The Extended Case Method* , 1998 .

[21]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[22]  Steven Brint,et al.  Professionals and the `Knowledge Economy': Rethinking the Theory of Postindustrial Society , 2001 .

[23]  Jack Kloppenburg,et al.  BIOTECHNOLOGY AND UNIVERSITY‐INDUSTRY RELATIONS: POLICY ISSUES IN RESEARCH AND THE OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AT A LAND GRANT UNIVERSITY , 1988 .

[24]  L. Zucker,et al.  Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[26]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Changes in intellectual property statutes and policies at a public university: Revising the terms of professional labor , 1993 .

[27]  D. Bok.  Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education , 2003 .

[28]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[30]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[31]  Kathleen A. Hart.  Is academic freedom bad for business , 1989 .

[32]  Steven Shapin,et al.  A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. , 1995 .

[33]  T. Gieryn.  Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[34]  M. Polanyi.  The Republic of science , 1962 .

[35]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  D Blumenthal,et al.  University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. , 1986, Science.

[37]  Edward J. Hackett,et al.  Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. , 1990 .

[38]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science , 2006 .

[39]  D. Stark.  Ambiguous Assets for Uncertain Environments: Heterarchy in Postsocialist Firms , 2009 .

[40]  John L. Rudolph,et al.  Scientists in the Classroom: The Cold War Reconstruction of American Science Education , 2002 .

[41]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form , 1994 .

[42]  S. Brint.  Creating the Future: ‘New Directions’ in American Research Universities , 2005 .

[43]  Scientists in Industry. , 1963 .

[44]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences , 2001 .

[45]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Working Through the Patent Problem , 2003, Science.

[46]  Paula Rossow,et al.  Making time : ethnographies of high-technology organizations , 1990 .

[47]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Entrepreneurial science: the second academic revolution , 1998 .

[48]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[49]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care , 2000 .

[50]  Simon Marcson,et al.  The Scientist in American Industry. , 1961 .

[51]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Capitalist Firm in the 21st Century: Emerging Patterns , 2000 .

[52]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[53]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  The changing context of science and university-industry relations: New Intersections of Industry and Academia , 1998 .

[54]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[55]  G. Masiero,et al.  Universities in the marketplace: the commercialization of higher education , 2003 .

[56]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Academic capitalism and the new economy : markets, state, and higher education , 2009 .

[57]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[58]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[59]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[60]  Elisabeth S. Clemens,et al.  The Typical Tools for the Job: Research Strategies in Institutional Analysis* , 2006 .

[61]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[62]  Robin S Stryker,et al.  Rules, Resources, and Legitimacy Processes: Some Implications for Social Conflict, Order, and Change , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.