Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process

Peer assessment has been used successfully in higher education, with important benefits reported in terms of student learning. However, most of the literature has focused on its use with small groups of students taught by staff who are committed to the peer assessment process. This paper reports the development of peer assessment procedures for use in large classes, using a cyclical process of action, reflection and refined action. The project was carried out in three phases and after each phase changes were made to the procedures in response to student and staff feedback. The development of procedures is discussed in relation to assessment tasks, assessment criteria, anonymity, procedural guidelines, distribution systems, marking procedures and tutor remarking. Although there are specific difficulties associated with the use of peer assessment in large classes, this study suggests that these are outweighed by the learning benefits for students. Based on the findings of this study, recommendations are made for ways in which peer assessment might be successfully applied in large classes.

[1]  Michael Searby,et al.  An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University , 1997 .

[2]  H. L. Billington Poster presentations and peer assessment: novel forms of evaluation and assessment , 1997 .

[3]  Keith Pond,et al.  Peer Review: a Precursor to Peer Assessment , 1995 .

[4]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review , 1999 .

[5]  Phil Davies,et al.  Computerized Peer Assessment , 2000 .

[6]  N. Falchikov Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment , 1995 .

[7]  W. Cheng,et al.  Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise , 1997 .

[8]  K. Topping,et al.  Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students , 2000 .

[9]  K. Oldfield,et al.  Peer and Self‐assessment at Tertiary Level ‐‐ an experiential report , 1995 .

[10]  Winnie Cheng,et al.  Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project , 1999 .

[11]  P. Orsmond,et al.  The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment , 1996 .

[12]  K. Topping Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[13]  Stephen Kemmis,et al.  PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH AND THE STUDY OF PRACTICE , 2002 .

[14]  David Boud,et al.  Enhancing learning through self assessment , 1995 .

[15]  J Spouse,et al.  The effects of class size and form of assessment on nursing students' performance, approaches to study and course perceptions. , 1997, Nurse education today.

[16]  S. Hanrahan,et al.  Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views , 2001 .

[17]  Liz McDowell,et al.  The Impact of Innovative Assessment on Student Learning , 1995 .

[18]  Graham Mowl,et al.  Using Self and Peer Assessment to Improve Students’ Essay Writing: a Case Study from Geography , 1995 .

[19]  Clare Brindley,et al.  Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes , 1998 .