Studies of viral DNA packaging motors with optical tweezers: a comparison of motor function in bacteriophages φ29, λ, and T4

A key step in the assembly of many viruses is the packaging of double-stranded DNA into a viral procapsid (an empty protein shell) by the action of an ATP-powered portal motor complex. We have developed methods to measure the packaging of single DNA molecules into single viral proheads in real time using optical tweezers. We can measure DNA binding and initiation of translocation, the DNA translocation dynamics, and the filling of the capsid against resisting forces. In addition to studying bacteriophage φ29, we have recently extended these methods to study the E. coli bacteriophages λ and T4, two important model systems in molecular biology. The three systems have different capsid sizes/shapes, genome lengths, and biochemical and structural differences in their packaging motors. Here, we compare and contrast these three systems. We find that all three motors translocate DNA processively and generate very large forces, each exceeding 50 piconewtons, ~20x higher force than generated by the skeletal muscle myosin 2 motor. This high force generation is required to overcome the forces resisting the confinement of the stiff, highly charged DNA at high density within the viral capsids. However, there are also striking differences between the three motors: they exhibit different DNA translocation rates, degrees of static and dynamic disorder, responses to load, and pausing and slipping dynamics.

[1]  A. Mehta,et al.  Single-molecule biomechanics with optical methods. , 1999, Science.

[2]  Carlos Bustamante,et al.  Supplemental data for : The Bacteriophage ø 29 Portal Motor can Package DNA Against a Large Internal Force , 2001 .

[3]  Paul J Jardine,et al.  Bacteriophage phi 29 DNA packaging. , 2002, Advances in virus research.

[4]  X. Xie,et al.  Single-molecule approach to dispersed kinetics and dynamic disorder: Probing conformational fluctuation and enzymatic dynamics , 2002 .

[5]  C. Bustamante,et al.  The mechanochemistry of molecular motors. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  Ever-fluctuating single enzyme molecules: Michaelis-Menten equation revisited , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[7]  A. Evilevitch,et al.  Measuring the Force Ejecting DNA from Phage , 2004 .

[8]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Forces during bacteriophage DNA packaging and ejection. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[9]  X. Xie,et al.  Single-molecule enzymatic dynamics. , 1998, Science.

[10]  William M Gelbart,et al.  Forces and pressures in DNA packaging and release from viral capsids. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Edward S. Yeung,et al.  Differences in the chemical reactivity of individual molecules of an enzyme , 1995, Nature.

[12]  Rachel Millin,et al.  A general method for manipulating DNA sequences from any organism with optical tweezers , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  Single-molecule kinetics of lambda exonuclease reveal base dependence and dynamic disorder. , 2003, Science.

[14]  Derek N. Fuller,et al.  Ionic effects on viral DNA packaging and portal motor function in bacteriophage φ29 , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Derek N. Fuller,et al.  DNA as a metrology standard for length and force measurements with optical tweezers. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[16]  X. Xie,et al.  Fluctuating Enzymes: Lessons from Single‐Molecule Studies , 2006 .

[17]  Steven M Block,et al.  Forward and reverse motion of single RecBCD molecules on DNA. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[18]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Fluctuation analysis of motor protein movement and single enzyme kinetics. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.