Speech perception in noise using directional microphones in open-canal hearing aids.

BACKGROUND Individuals with impaired hearing find it difficult to understand speech in the presence of background noise--a problem addressed effectively by directional microphones. As open-canal fittings have become increasingly popular in the recent past, so has the debate about the effective directional benefit available from these devices. PURPOSE This study investigates the benefit of directional microphones in two commercially available open-canal behind-the-ear hearing aids using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT). STUDY SAMPLE Sixteen individuals, between 50 and 85 year of age, with high-frequency bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and no previous hearing aid experience participated in this study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data Collection and Analysis: Individuals were asked to repeat sentences (presented at 0 degrees azimuth) in the presence of a diffuse-field uncorrelated broadband speech-shaped noise. HINT performance was compared across hearing instruments and conditions using a linear model with repeated measures. RESULTS There was a directional advantage of 2.6 dB as compared to the unaided condition. Average performance was worse in the omnidirectional mode as compared to the unaided condition. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that directional signal processing should not be precluded in open-canal instruments for listening in noisy environments.

[1]  Ruth A. Bentler,et al.  Effectiveness of directional technology in open‐canal hearing instruments , 2006 .

[2]  Brian Taylor,et al.  Real‐world satisfaction and benefit with open‐canal fittings , 2006 .

[3]  FACTS VS MYTHS: THE “SKINNY” ON SLIM-TUBE OPEN FITTINGS , 2010 .

[4]  Sergei Kochkin,et al.  MarkeTrak VII: Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age , 2005 .

[5]  10-Year Customer Satisfaction Trends in the US Hearing Instrument Market , 2002 .

[6]  O. D. Jensen,et al.  Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  J. Katz,et al.  Handbook of clinical audiology , 1978 .

[8]  T Ricketts,et al.  Directivity Quantification in Hearing Aids: Fitting and Measurement Effects , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[9]  R. Bentler.  Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[10]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  David Gnewikow,et al.  Hearing aid outcomes with open‐ and closed‐canal fittings , 2006 .

[12]  Steen Østergaard Olsen,et al.  Researchers report on a field test of a non‐occluding hearing instrument , 2003 .

[13]  Sergei Kochkin.  Consumers Rate Improvements Sought in Hearing Instruments , 2002 .

[14]  Stacie Nordrum,et al.  Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms. , 2006 .

[15]  H. Gustav Mueller.  Thereʼs less talking in barrels, but the occlusion effect is still with us , 2003 .

[16]  Ruth A Bentler,et al.  Predictive Measures of Directional Benefit Part 2: Verification of Different Approaches to Estimating Directional Benefit , 2007, Ear and hearing.