Learning 2D shape models

A new fully automated shape learning method is presented. It is based on clustering a set of training shapes in the original shape space (defined by the coordinates of the contour points) and performing a Procrustes analysis on each cluster to obtain cluster prototypes and information about shape variation. The main difference from previously reported methods is that the training set is first automatically clustered and those shapes considered to be outliers are discarded. The second difference is in the manner in which registered sets of points are extracted from each shape contour. As a direct application of our shape learning method, an 11-structure shape model of brain substructures was extracted from MR image data, an eigen-shape model was automatically trained, and employed to segment several MR brain images not present in the shape-training set. A quantitative analysis of our shape registration approach, within the main cluster of each structure, shows that our results compare very well to those achieved by manual registration; achieving an average rms error of about 1 pixel. Our approach can serve as a fully automated substitute to the tedious and time-consuming manual shape registration and analysis.

[1]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A mixture model for representing shape variation , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[2]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Segmentation and interpretation of MR brain images. An improved active shape model , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Eric Mjolsness,et al.  New Algorithms for 2D and 3D Point Matching: Pose Estimation and Correspondence , 1998, NIPS.

[4]  A Neumann,et al.  Statistical shape model based segmentation of medical images. , 1998, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[5]  José M. N. Leitão,et al.  Adaptive B-splines and boundary estimation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Automatic Landmark Identification Using a New Method of Non-rigid Correspondence , 1997, IPMI.

[7]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Modal Matching for Correspondence and Recognition , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  The Use of Active Shape Models for Locating Structures in Medical Images , 1993, IPMI.

[11]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Boundary Finding with Parametrically Deformable Models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Smoothing and matching of 3-d space curves , 1992, Other Conferences.

[13]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Registering Landsat images by point matching , 1989 .

[15]  S. Ullman Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[16]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Hierarchical Chamfer Matching: A Parametric Edge Matching Algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[18]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[19]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[20]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .