Effects of Instantaneous Multiband Dynamic Compression on Speech Intelligibility

The recruitment phenomenon, that is, the reduced dynamic range between threshold and uncomfortable level, is attributed to the loss of instantaneous dynamic compression on the basilar membrane. Despite this, hearing aids commonly use slow-acting dynamic compression for its compensation, because this was found to be the most successful strategy in terms of speech quality and intelligibility rehabilitation. Former attempts to use fast-acting compression gave ambiguous results, raising the question as to whether auditory-based recruitment compensation by instantaneous compression is in principle applicable in hearing aids. This study thus investigates instantaneous multiband dynamic compression based on an auditory filterbank. Instantaneous envelope compression is performed in each frequency band of a gammatone filterbank, which provides a combination of time and frequency resolution comparable to the normal healthy cochlea. The gain characteristics used for dynamic compression are deduced from categorical loudness scaling. In speech intelligibility tests, the instantaneous dynamic compression scheme was compared against a linear amplification scheme, which used the same filterbank for frequency analysis, but employed constant gain factors that restored the sound level for medium perceived loudness in each frequency band. In subjective comparisons, five of nine subjects preferred the linear amplification scheme and would not accept the instantaneous dynamic compression in hearing aids. Four of nine subjects did not perceive any quality differences. A sentence intelligibility test in noise (Oldenburg sentence test) showed little to no negative effects of the instantaneous dynamic compression, compared to linear amplification. A word intelligibility test in quiet (one-syllable rhyme test) showed that the subjects benefit from the larger amplification at low levels provided by instantaneous dynamic compression. Further analysis showed that the increase in intelligibility resulting from a gain provided by instantaneous compression is as high as from a gain provided by linear amplification. No negative effects of the distortions introduced by the instantaneous compression scheme in terms of speech recognition are observed.

[1]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[2]  B. Moore,et al.  Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Speech intelligibility in noise with fast compression hearing aids. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[4]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Christian Giguère,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF OUTER HAIR CELL DAMAGE: IMPLICATIONS FOR HEARING AID SIGNAL PROCESSING , 1999 .

[6]  H. Kojima,et al.  Nonlinear digital hearing aid with near-instantaneous amplitude compression , 2001, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[7]  D Byrne,et al.  The effects of multichannel compression/expansion amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B. Moore,et al.  Effect of the speed of a single-channel dynamic range compressor on intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S Gatehouse,et al.  The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Julius L. Goldstein,et al.  Signal processing strategies and clinical outcomes for gain and waveform compression in hearing aids , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[12]  B Kollmeier,et al.  The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  L Hickson,et al.  Consonant perception in quiet: effect of increasing the consonant-vowel ratio with compression amplification. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[14]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Martin Hansen Effects of Multi-Channel Compression Time Constants on Subjectively Perceived Sound Quality and Speech Intelligibility , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[16]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[17]  B. Moore Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage , 1995 .

[18]  I V Nábĕlek Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.