Unsupervised change detection in a particular vegetation land cover type using spectral angle mapper

Abstract This paper presents a new unsupervised change detection methodology for multispectral images applied to specific land covers. The proposed method involves comparing each image against a reference spectrum, where the reference spectrum is obtained from the spectral signature of the type of coverage you want to detect. In this case the method has been tested using multispectral images (SPOT5) of the community of Madrid (Spain), and multispectral images (Quickbird) of an area over Indonesia that was impacted by the December 26, 2004 tsunami; here, the tests have focused on the detection of changes in vegetation. The image comparison is obtained by applying Spectral Angle Mapper between the reference spectrum and each multitemporal image. Then, a threshold to produce a single image of change is applied, which corresponds to the vegetation zones. The results for each multitemporal image are combined through an exclusive or (XOR) operation that selects vegetation zones that have changed over time. Finally, the derived results were compared against a supervised method based on classification with the Support Vector Machine. Furthermore, the NDVI-differencing and the Spectral Angle Mapper techniques were selected as unsupervised methods for comparison purposes. The main novelty of the method consists in the detection of changes in a specific land cover type (vegetation), therefore, for comparison purposes, the best scenario is to compare it with methods that aim to detect changes in a specific land cover type (vegetation). This is the main reason to select NDVI-based method and the post-classification method (SVM implemented in a standard software tool). To evaluate the improvements using a reference spectrum vector, the results are compared with the basic-SAM method. In SPOT5 image, the overall accuracy was 99.36% and the κ index was 90.11%; in Quickbird image, the overall accuracy was 97.5% and the κ index was 82.16%. Finally, the precision results of the method are comparable to those of a supervised method, supported by low detection of false positives and false negatives, along with a high overall accuracy and a high kappa index. On the other hand, the execution times were comparable to those of unsupervised methods of low computational load.

[1]  P. Curran.  Principles of remote sensing , 1984 .

[2]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  Remote sensing of land-cover change and landscape context of the National Parks: A case study of the Northeast Temperate Network , 2009 .

[3]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Unsupervised change detection by kernel clustering , 2010, Remote Sensing.

[4]  Diego Renza,et al.  Quality assessment by region in spot images fused by means dual-tree complex wavelet transform , 2011 .

[5]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[6]  Ke-Sheng Cheng,et al.  Hypothesis-test-based landcover change detection using multi-temporal satellite images – A comparative study , 2008 .

[7]  Saeid Homayouni,et al.  Environmental monitoring based on automatic change detection from remotely sensed data: kernel-based approach , 2015 .

[8]  Qihao Weng,et al.  A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance , 2007 .

[9]  Wen-Hsiang Tsai,et al.  Moment-preserving thresolding: A new approach , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[10]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Saeid Homayouni,et al.  A Hybrid Kernel-Based Change Detection Method for Remotely Sensed Data in a Similarity Space , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[13]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  An automated binary change detection model using a calibration approach , 2007 .

[14]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  A New Approach to Change Vector Analysis Using Distance and Similarity Measures , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Nicholas J. Tate,et al.  A critical synthesis of remotely sensed optical image change detection techniques , 2015 .

[16]  Francesca Bovolo,et al.  A support vector domain method for change detection in multitemporal images , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  D. Lu,et al.  Change detection techniques , 2004 .

[18]  E. Martinez,et al.  Evaluation of different fuzzy knowledge acquisition methods for remote sensing image classification , 1999, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS'99 (Cat. No.99CH36293).

[19]  Francesca Bovolo,et al.  An unsupervised change detection technique based on Bayesian initialization and semisupervised SVM , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[20]  N. Keshava,et al.  Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  W. Rees.  Physical Principles of Remote Sensing , 1990 .

[22]  F. Meer.  The effectiveness of spectral similarity measures for the analysis of hyperspectral imagery , 2006 .

[23]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Unsupervised Change Detection With Kernels , 2012, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[24]  Diego Renza,et al.  A New Approach to Change Detection in Multispectral Images by Means of ERGAS Index , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[25]  Dawei Han,et al.  Selection of classification techniques for land use - land cover change investigation , 2012 .

[26]  Paul L. Rosin,et al.  Evaluation of global image thresholding for change detection , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[27]  Manfred Ehlers,et al.  Automated Techniques for Change Detection Using Combined Edge Segment Texture Analysis, GIS, and 3D Information , 2014 .

[28]  Paul L. Rosin.  Thresholding for change detection , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[29]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[30]  Fusheng Yu,et al.  An Automatic Unsupervised Method Based on Context-Sensitive Spectral Angle Mapper for Change Detection of Remote Sensing Images , 2014, ADMA.

[31]  Andrew K. C. Wong,et al.  A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[32]  Francesca Bovolo,et al.  A Framework for Automatic and Unsupervised Detection of Multiple Changes in Multitemporal Images , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[33]  P.K Sahoo,et al.  A survey of thresholding techniques , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..