Social discount rates for the European Union: an overview

Time discounting in the public sector remains a source of confusion and some academic controversy. The very concept of a ”social” discount rate, not revealed by the market, is rejected by mainstream financial economics. Elsewhere the setting of public sector discount rates equal to the commercial return on private investment continues to have wide appeal. Both these approaches are flawed. More widely favoured by experts in the field today is a rate derived as the sum of pure time preference for marginal utility and a factor reflecting the decline in marginal utility of income as per capita income increases. However controversy continues about pure time preference, especially in the absence of any empirical data on people’s social (as opposed to individual) preferences. There is empirical evidence from several sources on the income elasticity of marginal utility, but it is very thin, although informed opinion, for developed economies, generally lies today on the range of -1 to -2. The discount rate is also often seen by ministers and officials as an instrument to promote their own national or departmental policy objectives. Further problems arise from confusions between discounting, the government cost of capital, and the rate of return for a public body trading in competitive markets. Within the EU there is much to be said for each Member State establishing its own standard government discount rate for general use, which might in most cases be in the region of 4% to 5% in real terms. However the application of discounting to the very long term is at best contentious. And discounting should not be allowed to divert attention from other, often much more important appraisal assumptions

[1]  S. Wadhwani The US stock market and the global economic crisis , 1999, National Institute Economic Review.

[2]  Richard L. Hudson,et al.  The Misbehavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin, and Reward , 2004 .

[3]  O. Eckstein Water-Resource Development: The Economics of Project Evaluation , 1959 .

[4]  R. Lind,et al.  Reassessing the government's discount rate policy in light of new theory and data in a world economy with a high degree of capital mobility , 1990 .

[5]  P. Layard,et al.  COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: SELECTED READINGS. , 1974 .

[6]  R. Newell Discounting the Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation: How Much Do Uncertain Rates Increase Valuations? , 2001 .

[7]  K. Mera Experimental Determination of Relative Marginal Utilities , 1969 .

[8]  Maurice FitzGerald Scott,et al.  A new view of economic growth , 1989 .

[9]  M. Cropper,et al.  Preferences for life saving programs: how the public discounts time and age , 1994 .

[10]  Michael Klein,et al.  The risk premium for evaluating public projects , 1997 .

[11]  Jack Hirshleifer,et al.  Investment Decision Under Uncertainty: Applications of the State-Preference Approach , 1966 .

[12]  Anthony B. Atkinson,et al.  Public Economics in Action: The Basic Income/Flat Tax Proposal , 1995 .

[13]  R. Solow The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics , 2008 .

[14]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[15]  David J. Evans,et al.  Social discount rates for member countries of the European Union , 2005 .

[16]  Ian A. Cooper,et al.  Investment Appraisal in the Public Sector , 1997 .

[17]  T. Koopmans,et al.  STATIONARY UTILITY AND TIME PERSPECTIVE1 , 1964 .

[18]  E. Kula An Empirical Investigation on the Social Time-Preference Rate for the United Kingdom , 1985 .

[19]  Raymond J. Kopp,et al.  Mock Referenda for Intergenerational Decisionmaking , 1997 .

[20]  Kenneth J. Arrow Criteria for social investment , 1965 .

[21]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Risk and the Discount Rate for Public Investment , 2005 .

[22]  O. Eckstein A Survey of the Theory of Public Expenditure Criteria , 1961 .

[23]  E. Auriol,et al.  The Marginal Cost of Public Funds in Africa , 2005 .

[24]  T. Koopmans Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience , 1960 .

[25]  Colin Price,et al.  Time, discounting, and value , 1993 .

[26]  O. Eckstein Investment Criteria for Economic Development and the Theory of Intertemporal Welfare Economics , 1957 .

[27]  A. Sandmo Redistribution and the marginal cost of public funds , 1998 .

[28]  David F. Bradford,et al.  Constraints on Government Investment Opportunities and the Choice of Discount Rate , 1975 .

[29]  F. Hayek Utility Analysis and Interest , 1936 .

[30]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[31]  Richard E. Matland,et al.  Doing Rawls Justice: An Experimental Study of Income Distribution Norms , 2003 .

[32]  I. Little,et al.  Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries , 1974 .

[33]  Paul A. Grout,et al.  Public and private sector discount rates in public–private partnerships† , 2003 .

[34]  S. A. Marglin,et al.  The Opportunity Costs of Public Investment , 1963 .

[35]  M. Feldstein The Social Time Preference Discount Rate in Cost Benefit Analysis , 1964 .

[36]  F. Ramsey,et al.  THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF SAVING , 1928 .

[37]  A. Sandmo Discount Rates for Public Investment Under Uncertainty , 1972 .

[38]  William F. Baumol On the Social Rate of Discount , 1974 .

[39]  Miles S. Kimball,et al.  Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Survey , 1995 .

[40]  J. Weyant,et al.  Discounting and Intergenerational Equity , 1999 .

[41]  M. Feldstein,et al.  HOW BIG SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE? , 1996, National Tax Journal.

[42]  Costas Meghir,et al.  Consumer demand and the life-cycle allocation of household expenditures , 1993 .

[43]  A. Sen On Economic Inequality , 1974 .

[44]  M. Fg. Scott The Test Rate of Discount and Changes in Base-Level Income in the United Kingdom , 1977 .

[45]  E. Kula,et al.  Derivation of Social Time Preference Rates for the United States and Canada , 1984 .