Capital Budgeting for Volume Flexible Equipment

Recent advances in technology have created opportunities for firms to invest in expensive automated equipment designed to improve volume flexibility. Such investments are made on the basis that flexibility benefits the firm by increasing managerial control over output, reducing the risk of demand uncertainty, and improving productivity. The presumption is that these benefits will eventually translate to higher cash flows, appreciation in the firm's market value, and better return to shareholders. Yet, there is no managerially useful analytical framework for measuring this relationship. This study develops a model that uses contingent claims analysis to evaluate the effect of volume flexibility on the firm's value and to determine the optimal degree of automation that maximizes share value. The analysis is done by taking into consideration alternative demand characteristics, cost patterns, and the effectiveness of volume flexibility in increasing managerial control over output, reducing the risk of demand uncertainty, and improving productivity.

[1]  D. P. Baron,et al.  Demand Uncertainty in Imperfect Competition , 1971 .

[2]  H. Leland..  Theory of the Firm Facing Uncertain Demand , 1972 .

[3]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Clifford W. Smith,et al.  Option pricing: A review , 1976 .

[5]  Y. Sugimori,et al.  Toyota production system and Kanban system Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system , 1977 .

[6]  R. Schonberger.  The Transfer of Japanese Manufacturing Management Approaches to U.S. Industry , 1982 .

[7]  Evan L. Porteus.  Investing in Reduced Setups in the EOQ Model , 1985 .

[8]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Evaluating Natural Resource Investments , 1985 .

[9]  R. McDonald,et al.  Investment and the Valuation of Firms When There Is an Option to Shut Down , 1985 .

[10]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  Organizational implications of CAM , 1985 .

[11]  John Bessant,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing systems , 1986 .

[12]  Arthur V. Hill,et al.  Reducing vendor delivery uncertainties in a JIT environment , 1986 .

[13]  P. Billington.  The classic economic production quantity model with setup cost as a function of capital expenditure , 1987 .

[14]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey , 1990 .

[15]  Kee H. Chung.  Output decision under demand uncertainty with stochastic production function: a contingent claims approach , 1990 .

[16]  Alexander J. Triantis,et al.  Valuing Flexibility as a Complex Option , 1990 .

[17]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity , 1990 .

[18]  Gerald Aranoff,et al.  Capital budgeting with technology choice and demand fluctuations in a simple manufacturing model: Sample calculations and observations on output flexibility , 1992 .

[19]  L. Trigeorgis.  Real options and interactions with financial flexibility , 1993 .

[20]  Kee H. Chung.  COST‐VOLUME‐PROFIT ANALYSIS UNDER UNCERTAINTY WHEN THE FIRM HAS PRODUCTION FLEXIBILITY , 1993 .

[21]  Anna Kochan.  Siemens Automotive — Robots and Lasers , 1993 .

[22]  W. R. Newman,et al.  Adapting traditional breakeven analysis to modern production economics: Simultaneously modeling economies of scale and scope , 1993 .

[23]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility , 1995 .