Danger, Mystery, and Environmental Preference

The possibility of a connection among high mystery, perceived danger, and depressed preference for certain categories of environments was investigated. Past research had suggested that urban alleys and narrow canyons would exhibit such a pattern. Comparison categories, chosen to be high in mystery and low in perceived danger, were urban and nonurban nature (that is, field-and-forest settings within urban or nonurban environments), respectively. Preference ratings were obtained for settings from each of the four categories. The settings were also rated by independent raters for six predictor variables: mystery, physical danger, social danger, shadow, nature, and vertical depth. The major findings were that danger was a negative predictor of preference and mystery was a positive predictor. There was no evidence that high mystery was involved in depressed preference ratings for any of the environmental categories investigated. The distinction between physical and social danger proved useful, with only social danger related (negatively) to preference.

[1]  Recent Energy Models: A Review of Methodologies , 1977 .

[2]  S. Kaplan Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition , 1987 .

[3]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material , 1972 .

[4]  E. L. Wike Data Analysis , 1971, Small‐Angle Scattering.

[5]  Ann Arbor,et al.  Humanscape: Environments for People , 1977 .

[6]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Perception of Personal Safety in Urban Recreation Sites , 1984 .

[7]  Thomas R. Herzog,et al.  A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Natural Environments: Mountains, Canyons, and Deserts , 1987, Landscape Journal.

[8]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[9]  Theodora Kimball Hubbard,et al.  An introduction to the study of landscape design , 1917 .

[10]  Jay Appleton,et al.  Prospects and Refuges Re-Visited , 1984, Landscape Journal.

[11]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The prediction of preference for unfamiliar urban places , 1982 .

[12]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  A cognitive analysis of preference for field‐and‐forest environments , 1984 .

[13]  R. Millward,et al.  The Experience of Landscape , 1988 .

[14]  Robert M. Itami,et al.  Mystery in an Information Processing Model of Landscape Preference , 1985, Landscape Journal.

[15]  Domenic V. Cicchetti,et al.  Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in the analysis of variance: A rapid approximate solution. , 1972 .

[16]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes , 1985 .

[17]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Cognition and Environment: Function - ing in an Uncertain World , 1983 .

[18]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Environmental Design Research , 2018 .