ModelTeller: model selection for optimal phylogenetic reconstruction using machine learning.
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Rosset | T. Pupko | I. Mayrose | O. Avram | S. Abadi | Oren Avram | Shiran Abadi | Saharon Rosset
[1] Alexey M. Kozlov,et al. ModelTest-NG: A New and Scalable Tool for the Selection of DNA and Protein Evolutionary Models , 2019, bioRxiv.
[2] Itay Mayrose,et al. Model selection may not be a mandatory step for phylogeny reconstruction , 2019, Nature Communications.
[3] Anton Suvorov,et al. Accurate inference of tree topologies from multiple sequence alignments using deep learning , 2019, bioRxiv.
[4] Robert Lanfear,et al. PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses. , 2016, Molecular biology and evolution.
[5] Danilo Bzdok,et al. Classical Statistics and Statistical Learning in Imaging Neuroscience , 2016, Front. Neurosci..
[6] Alexandros Stamatakis,et al. Does the choice of nucleotide substitution models matter topologically? , 2016, BMC Bioinformatics.
[7] M. Kuhner,et al. Practical performance of tree comparison metrics. , 2015, Systematic biology.
[8] Richard Van Noorden,et al. The top 100 papers , 2014, Nature.
[9] Céline Scornavacca,et al. OrthoMaM v8: a database of orthologous exons and coding sequences for comparative genomics in mammals. , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.
[10] Arnold Kuzniar,et al. Selectome update: quality control and computational improvements to a database of positive selection , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..
[11] Ramón Doallo,et al. CircadiOmics: integrating circadian genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics , 2012, Nature Methods.
[12] Hilmar Lapp,et al. NeXML: Rich, Extensible, and Verifiable Representation of Comparative Data and Metadata , 2012, Systematic biology.
[13] Krzysztof Giaro,et al. TreeCmp: Comparison of Trees in Polynomial Time , 2012, Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online.
[14] Mateus Patricio,et al. Genome-Wide Heterogeneity of Nucleotide Substitution Model Fit , 2011, Genome biology and evolution.
[15] Gaël Varoquaux,et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[16] Nick Goldman,et al. PhyloSim - Monte Carlo simulation of sequence evolution in the R statistical computing environment , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.
[17] O. Gascuel,et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. , 2010, Systematic biology.
[18] Ziheng Yang,et al. INDELible: A Flexible Simulator of Biological Sequence Evolution , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.
[19] D. Posada. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.
[20] Jack Sullivan,et al. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis? , 2008, Systematic biology.
[21] Frédéric Delsuc,et al. OrthoMaM: A database of orthologous genomic markers for placental mammal phylogenetics , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[22] Hyrum Carroll,et al. DNA reference alignment benchmarks based on tertiary structure of encoded proteins , 2007, Bioinform..
[23] S. Kotsiantis. Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques , 2007, Informatica.
[24] Michael A. Thomas,et al. Model use in phylogenetics: nine key questions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[25] Sean M. Polyn,et al. Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[26] Rich Caruana,et al. An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms , 2006, ICML.
[27] Frédéric Delsuc,et al. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[28] Olivier Poch,et al. BAliBASE 3.0: Latest developments of the multiple sequence alignment benchmark , 2005, Proteins.
[29] Thomas Ludwig,et al. RAxML-OMP: An Efficient Program for Phylogenetic Inference on SMPs , 2005, PaCT.
[30] Zaid Abdo,et al. Evaluating the performance of a successive-approximations approach to parameter optimization in maximum-likelihood phylogeny estimation. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[31] Zaid Abdo,et al. Accounting for uncertainty in the tree topology has little effect on the decision-theoretic approach to model selection in phylogeny estimation. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[32] M. Kimura. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences , 1980, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[33] H. Kishino,et al. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[34] J. Felsenstein. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[35] D. Posada,et al. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. , 2004, Systematic biology.
[36] N. Ben-Tal,et al. Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: empirical Bayesian methods are superior. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[37] Robert C. Edgar,et al. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[38] Jason Weston,et al. Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.
[39] David L. Swofford,et al. Are Guinea Pigs Rodents? The Importance of Adequate Models in Molecular Phylogenetics , 1997, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.
[40] A. Zharkikh. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences , 1994, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[41] N. Goldman. Simple diagnostic statistical tests of models for DNA substitution , 1993, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[42] Nick Goldman,et al. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution , 1993, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[43] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. OXBench: A benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.
[44] Zaid Abdo,et al. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[45] O. Gascuel,et al. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[46] Simon Whelan,et al. Pandit: a database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees , 2003, Bioinform..
[47] Tal Pupko,et al. Combining multiple data sets in a likelihood analysis: which models are the best? , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.
[48] Jonathan P. Bollback,et al. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.
[49] C. Cunningham,et al. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.
[50] D. Swofford,et al. Should we use model-based methods for phylogenetic inference when we know that assumptions about among-site rate variation and nucleotide substitution pattern are violated? , 2001, Systematic biology.
[51] M J Sanderson,et al. Sources of error and confidence intervals in estimating the age of angiosperms from rbcL and 18S rDNA data. , 2001, American journal of botany.
[52] K. Crandall,et al. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. , 2001, Systematic biology.
[53] David Posada,et al. The Effect of Branch Length Variation on the Selection of Models of Molecular Evolution , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[54] C. Simon,et al. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. , 2001, Systematic biology.
[55] M J Sanderson,et al. Parametric phylogenetics? , 2000, Systematic biology.
[56] F J Ayala,et al. A new method for characterizing replacement rate variation in molecular sequences. Application of the Fourier and wavelet models to Drosophila and mammalian proteins. , 2000, Genetics.
[57] J. Zhang,et al. Performance of likelihood ratio tests of evolutionary hypotheses under inadequate substitution models. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[58] Peer Bork,et al. SMART: identification and annotation of domains from signalling and extracellular protein sequences , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..
[59] Nick Goldman,et al. Phylogenetic information and experimental design in molecular systematics , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[60] David Posada,et al. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..
[61] K. Crandall,et al. Phylogeny Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Using Maximum Likelihood , 1997 .
[62] B. Rannala,et al. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. , 1997, Science.
[63] O Gascuel,et al. BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.
[64] Nick Goldman,et al. MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD TREES FROM DNA SEQUENCES: A PECULIAR STATISTICAL ESTIMATION PROBLEM , 1995 .
[65] Richard M. Golden. Making correct statistical inferences using a wrong probability model , 1995 .
[66] A. von Haeseler,et al. A stochastic model for the evolution of autocorrelated DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[67] J. Felsenstein,et al. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[68] M. Nei,et al. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.
[69] G A Churchill,et al. Sample size for a phylogenetic inference. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.
[70] K. Tamura,et al. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.
[71] Clifford M. Hurvich,et al. Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .
[72] Jack D. Cowan. Some mathematical questions in biology: Neurobiology : Robert M. Miura (editor), Lectures on mathematics in the life sciences, Volume 15, Providence RI: American Mathematics Society, 1982 , 1984 .
[73] J. Kent. Robust properties of likelihood ratio tests , 1982 .
[74] D. Robinson,et al. Comparison of phylogenetic trees , 1981 .
[75] G. Schwarz. Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .
[76] N. Sugiura. Further analysts of the data by akaike' s information criterion and the finite corrections , 1978 .
[77] Robert V. Foutz,et al. The Performance of the Likelihood Ratio Test When the Model is Incorrect , 1977 .
[78] G. Box. Science and Statistics , 1976 .
[79] H. Akaike. A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .
[80] J. Cowan,et al. Some mathematical questions in biology , 1974 .
[81] H. Akaike,et al. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .
[82] T. Jukes. CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .
[83] H. Munro,et al. Mammalian protein metabolism , 1964 .