US PATENT CITATIONS DATA AND INDUSTRIAL KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS

The aim of this paper is to empirically evaluate the US interindustry knowledge spillover using the NBER patents data file (1963–1999). Reputing the patent backward citations as a good proxy of the patent's knowledge spillover, we proceed by building a time series to each US manufacturing industry patent citations and their lags. Then, we generate the time series of the external and the internal knowledge flow indices, showing that traditional sectors are more technology-dependent from the others than the new one. Here, in the spirit of Pavitt [Pavitt, Research Policy 13, 343–73, 1984]. We derive a new taxonomy of innovation focusing on the ideas instead of the goods production in order to obtain the innovation linkage and trajectories. Once we determined that each sector's most cited patents are typically belong to the ‘new’ sectors, we evaluate the high- and low-tech sectors innovation effect on the whole economy innovation process. Confirming that the high-tech sectors, and its R&D expenditures, are the most important, we conclude that it is the giant's shoulders, substance of the whole economy.

[1]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag? , 1986 .

[2]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of Nasa and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation , 1997 .

[3]  M. Lessnoff Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[4]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D: is There a Lag? , 1984 .

[5]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[6]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[7]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[8]  Michael K. Fung*,et al.  Identification of technological structures using patent statistics , 2003 .

[9]  J. Stock,et al.  INFERENCE IN LINEAR TIME SERIES MODELS WITH SOME UNIT ROOTS , 1990 .

[10]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[11]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[12]  Leo Sveikauskas,et al.  The Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. , 1986 .

[13]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[14]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-Industry Technology Flows in the United States : Research Policy , 1987 .

[15]  Giammario Impullitti,et al.  Technological policy and wage inequality , 2006 .

[16]  Thomas Hatzichronoglou Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification , 1997 .

[17]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[18]  Francesco Schettino An empirical analysis of endogenous growth without scale effect , 2005 .

[19]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[20]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[21]  Francesco Schettino The Role of Anti-Spying Acts on R&D Patents Dynamics , 2005 .

[22]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[23]  C. Granger,et al.  Spurious regressions in econometrics , 1974 .