Physical system modelling with known parameters together with 2-D or high order look-up tables (obtained from experimental data), have been the preferred method for simulating electric vehicles. The non-linear phenomena which are present at the vehicle tyre patch and ground interface have resulted in a quantitative understanding of this phenomena. However, nowadays, there is a requirement for a deeper understanding of the vehicle sub-models which previously used look-up tables. In this paper the hybrid modelling methodology used for electric vehicle systems offers a two-stage advantage: firstly, the vehicle model retains a comprehensive analytical formulation and secondly, the 'fuzzy' element offers, in addition to the quantitative results, a qualitative understanding of specific vehicle sub-models. In the literature several hybrid topologies are reported, sequential, auxiliary, and embedded. In this paper, the hybrid model topology selected is auxiliary and within the same hybrid model, the first paradigm used is the vehicle dynamics together with the actuator/gearbox system. The second paradigm is the non-linear fuzzy tyre model for each wheel. In particular, conventional physical system dynamic modelling has been combined with the fuzzy logic type-II or type-III methodology. The resulting hybrid-fuzzy tyre models were estimated for a-priori number of rules from experimental data. The physical system modelling required the available vehicle parameters such as the overall mass, wheel radius and chassis dimensions. The suggested synergetic fusion of the two methods, (hybrid-fuzzy), allowed the vehicle planar trajectories to be obtained prior to the hardware development of the entire vehicle. The strength of this methodology is that it requires localised system experimental data rather than global system data. The disadvantage in obtaining global experimental data is the requirement for comprehensive testing of a vehicle prototype which is both time consuming process and requires extensive resources. In this paper the authors have proposed the use of existing experimental rigs which are available from the leading automotive manufacturers. Hence, for the 'hybrid' modelling, localised data sets were used. In particular, wheel-tyre experimental data were obtained from the University tyre rig experimental facilities. Tyre forces acting on the tyre patch are mainly responsible for the overall electric vehicle motion. In addition, tyre measurement rigs are a well known method for obtaining localised data thus allowing the effective simulation of more detailed mathematical models. These include, firstly, physical system modelling (conventional vehicle dynamics), secondly, fuzzy type II or III modelling (for the tyre characteristics), and thirdly, electric drive modelling within the context of electric vehicles. The proposed hybrid model synthesis has resulted in simulation results which are similar to piece-wise 'look-up' table solutions. In addition, the strength of the 'hybrid' synthesis is that the analyst has a set of rules which clearly show the reasoning behind the complex development of the vehicle tyre forces. This is due to the inherent transparency of the type II and type III methodologies. Finally, the authors discussed the reasons for selecting a type-III framework. The paper concludes with a plethora of simulation results.
[1]
John T. Economou,et al.
Modelling of skid steering and fuzzy logic vehicle ground interaction
,
2000,
Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).
[2]
C. Canudas-de-Wit.
Comments on "A new model for control of systems with friction"
,
1998,
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..
[3]
Michio Sugeno,et al.
On stability of fuzzy systems expressed by fuzzy rules with singleton consequents
,
1999,
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..
[4]
M. S. Fadali,et al.
A new approach for designing TSK fuzzy systems from input-output data
,
2002,
Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).
[5]
Dimitar Filev,et al.
Generation of Fuzzy Rules by Mountain Clustering
,
1994,
J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..
[6]
John T. Economou.
Fuzzy logic force modelling
,
2002,
Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).
[7]
Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.
About the use of fuzzy clustering techniques for fuzzy model identification
,
1999,
Fuzzy Sets Syst..
[8]
Martin Brown,et al.
Advances in neurofuzzy algorithms for real-time modelling and control
,
1996
.
[9]
W. Sienel.
Robust decoupling for active car steering holds for arbitrary dynamic tire characteristics
,
1995
.
[10]
Giovanni Ulivi,et al.
Fuzzy Logic Applications in Mobile Robotics
,
1999
.
[11]
U. Kaymak,et al.
Compatible cluster merging for fuzzy modelling
,
1995,
Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems..
[12]
Stephen L. Chiu,et al.
Fuzzy Model Identification Based on Cluster Estimation
,
1994,
J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..
[13]
B. A. White,et al.
Takagi–Sugeno model synthesis of a quasi-linear multiwheeled mobile robot
,
2003,
Int. J. Syst. Sci..
[14]
Chris J. Harris,et al.
Neurofuzzy state estimators and their applications
,
1999
.
[15]
Peter J. Fleming,et al.
Automatic tuning of controllers using a neural-genetic system
,
1999
.
[16]
Efstathios Velenis,et al.
EXTENSION OF THE LUGRE DYNAMIC TIRE FRICTION MODEL TO 2D MOTION
,
2002
.
[17]
Mo-Yuen Chow,et al.
Heuristic constraints enforcement for training of and knowledge extraction from a fuzzy/neural architecture. I. Foundation
,
1999,
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..
[18]
T D Gillespie,et al.
Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics
,
1992
.