A machine learning based approach for predicting blockchain adoption in supply Chain

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to provide a decision support system for managers to predict an organization's probability of successful blockchain adoption using a machine learning technique. The study conceptualizes blockchain technology as a dynamic capability that should be possessed by the organization to remain competitive. The factors influencing the blockchain adoption behavior were modeled using the theoretical lens of the Technology Acceptance Model and Technology-organisation-Environment framework. The findings identify competitor pressure, partner readiness, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use as the most influencing factors for blockchain adoption. A predictive decision support system was developed using a Bayesian network analysis featuring the significant factors that can be used by the decision-makers for predicting the probability of blockchain adoption in their organization. The prior probability values reported in the study may be used as indicators by the practitioners to predict their blockchain adoption probability. The practitioner will be required to substitute these probability values (high or low), as applicable to their organization to estimate the adoption probability. The use of the decision support system is likely to help the decision-makers to assess their adoption probability and develop future adoption strategies.

[1]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[2]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Bayesian network modelling for supply chain risk propagation , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[3]  Abdellah Ait Ouahman,et al.  Towards a Novel Privacy-Preserving Access Control Model Based on Blockchain Technology in IoT , 2017 .

[4]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[5]  Zoran Kalinic,et al.  Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach , 2017 .

[6]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[7]  Keng-Boon Ooi,et al.  An SEM-artificial-neural-network analysis of the relationships between SERVPERF, customer satisfaction and loyalty among low-cost and full-service airline , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  S. Jackson,et al.  Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Management Practices , 1987 .

[9]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Determinants of e-business diffusion: A test of the technology diffusion perspective , 2008 .

[10]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[11]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[12]  Peter Kawalek,et al.  Predicting SMEs' adoption of enterprise systems , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[13]  Eta Wahab,et al.  THE ADOPTION OF ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE (EDI) TECHNOLOGY BY NIGERIAN SMES: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 2012 .

[14]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Blockchain Adoption in Supply Chain Networks in Asia , 2019, IT Professional.

[15]  Joana B. Pereira,et al.  Blockchain-based platforms: Decentralized infrastructures and its boundary conditions , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[16]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[17]  Muragesh Pattansheti,et al.  Development, measurement and validation of an integrated technology readiness acceptance and planned behaviour model for Indian mobile banking industry , 2016, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Firms patterns of e-business adoption: evidence for the European Union-27. , 2009 .

[19]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Unearthing the determinants of Blockchain adoption in supply chain management , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[20]  Chang Liu,et al.  Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet , 2003, Internet Res..

[21]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  Predicting and explaining patronage behavior toward web and traditional stores using neural networks: a comparative analysis with logistic regression , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Shuchih Ernest Chang,et al.  Supply chain re-engineering using blockchain technology: A case of smart contract based tracking process , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[23]  Mary Lacity,et al.  Addressing Key Challenges to Making Enterprise Blockchain Applications a Reality , 2018, MIS Q. Executive.

[24]  Qinghui Zhang,et al.  3D printing technology and its impact on Chinese manufacturing , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[25]  M. Sambasivan,et al.  Factors influencing strategic alliance outcomes in a manufacturing supply chain: Role of alliance motives, interdependence, asset specificity and relational capital , 2013 .

[26]  Fethi Calisir,et al.  Predicting the behavioral intention to use enterprise resource planning systems , 2009 .

[27]  Namho Chung,et al.  A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services , 2012 .

[28]  Hema Date,et al.  Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Chinyao Low,et al.  Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[30]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[31]  Shih‐Yi Chien,et al.  Dynamic capability, knowledge, learning, and firm performance , 2012 .

[32]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[33]  Lisa Napolitano,et al.  Customer-Supplier Partnering: A Strategy Whose Time Has Come , 2013 .

[34]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  Modeling the stimulators of the behavioral intention to use mobile entertainment: Does gender really matter? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[36]  David Gefen,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000 .

[37]  David Swanson,et al.  The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency , 2018 .

[38]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Pattern Recognition, Statistical , 2006 .

[39]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[40]  Hokey Min,et al.  Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience , 2019, Business Horizons.

[41]  Reza Kerachian,et al.  Developing monthly operating rules for a cascade system of reservoirs: Application of Bayesian Networks , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[42]  Esben Budtz-Jørgensen,et al.  Structural Equation Models , 2005 .

[43]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  Causal modeling alternatives in operations research: Overview and application , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[45]  Markus Kraft,et al.  Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: Machine-to-machine electricity market , 2017 .

[46]  Abroon Qazi,et al.  Supply chain risk network management : a Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks , 2018 .

[47]  Martin White,et al.  Internet of Things, Blockchain and Shared Economy Applications , 2016, EUSPN/ICTH.

[48]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[49]  Zina Ben Miled,et al.  A Distributed Ledger for Supply Chain Physical Distribution Visibility , 2017, Inf..

[50]  E. Shortliffe,et al.  An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. , 1981, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[51]  Susie R. Wu,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review , 2016, Ecological Processes.

[52]  Guangying Hua,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Online Banking Adoption in China , 2008, AMCIS.

[53]  Walid Al-Saqaf,et al.  Blockchain technology for social impact: opportunities and challenges ahead , 2017 .

[54]  Michael Scharkow,et al.  The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2013, Psychological science.

[55]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[56]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  1 Blockchain's roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[57]  Kim Sundtoft Hald,et al.  How the blockchain enables and constrains supply chain performance , 2019, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.

[58]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology , 1987 .

[59]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models , 1996, Monographs in Computer Science.

[60]  Simona Sternad Zabukovsek,et al.  SEM–ANN based research of factors’ impact on extended use of ERP systems , 2018, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[61]  Gareth R. T. White Future applications of blockchain in business and management: A Delphi study , 2017 .

[62]  Samuel Fosso Wamba,et al.  Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[63]  Concha Bielza,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian networks and artificial neural networks for quality detection in a machining process , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[64]  J. Pearl Graphs, Causality, and Structural Equation Models , 1998 .

[65]  Ainin Sulaiman,et al.  Technology Complexity, Personal Innovativeness And Intention To Use Wireless Internet Using Mobile Devices In Malaysia , 2008 .

[66]  Tim Coltman,et al.  Modeling the Operational Capabilities for Customized and Commoditized Services , 2013 .

[67]  Paul Krause,et al.  Bayesian Networks for the management of greenhouse gas emissions in the British agricultural sector , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[68]  Syed Wafa,et al.  The Effect of Perceived Risk on the Intention to Use E-commerce: The Case of Algeria , 2009 .

[69]  Vasilis Kostakis,et al.  Blockchain and Value Systems in the Sharing Economy: The Illustrative Case of Backfeed , 2017 .

[70]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Coming Full Circle in the History of Factor Indeterminancy. , 1996, Multivariate behavioral research.

[71]  Hart O. Awa,et al.  Determinant factors of information communication technology (ICT) adoption by government-owned universities in Nigeria: A qualitative approach , 2013, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[72]  M. Iansiti,et al.  The Truth about Blockchain , 2017 .

[73]  Yu Min Wang,et al.  Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry , 2010 .

[74]  David Heckerman,et al.  A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks , 1999, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[75]  Ariel Gabizon,et al.  Cryptocurrencies Without Proof of Work , 2014, Financial Cryptography Workshops.

[76]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain , 2014, Educational and psychological measurement.

[77]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Potential roles of blockchain in fighting poverty and reducing financial exclusion in the global south , 2017 .

[78]  Patarapong Intarakumnerd,et al.  Alternative technological learning paths of Taiwanese firms , 2019, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation.

[79]  Omar F. El-Gayar,et al.  Security Policy Compliance: User Acceptance Perspective , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[80]  Feiping Nie,et al.  Multiclass Capped ℓp-Norm SVM for Robust Classifications , 2017, AAAI.

[81]  Joachim Diederich Explanation and Artificial Neural Networks , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[82]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[83]  Markus Bick,et al.  Blockchain Applications in Supply Chain Transactions , 2020, Journal of Business Logistics.

[84]  A. N. Oppenheim Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement , 1966 .

[85]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[86]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here? , 2006 .

[87]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Linking structural equation modeling to Bayesian networks: Decision support for customer retention in virtual communities , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[88]  Ehri Ryu,et al.  Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[89]  Jannis Angelis,et al.  Blockchain adoption: A value driver perspective , 2019, Business Horizons.

[90]  T. Mackey,et al.  A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines , 2017, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[91]  Christian Kowalkowski,et al.  Network orchestration for value platform development , 2017 .

[92]  J. Woodward,et al.  Independence, Invariance and the Causal Markov Condition , 1999, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[93]  M. Miller,et al.  Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models , 2013, Educational and psychological measurement.

[94]  Emin Gün Sirer,et al.  Bitcoin-NG: A Scalable Blockchain Protocol , 2015, NSDI.

[95]  Iwao Sasase,et al.  A Novel Blockchain-Based Product Ownership Management System (POMS) for Anti-Counterfeits in the Post Supply Chain , 2017, IEEE Access.

[96]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology: A panacea or pariah for resources conservation and recycling? , 2018 .

[97]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[98]  Rafael Rumí,et al.  Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[99]  Garry Wei-Han Tan,et al.  Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-Neural Networks approach , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[100]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[101]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[102]  S. West,et al.  The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. , 1996 .

[103]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[104]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..