COVID‐19 and cardiac surgery: A perspective from United Kingdom

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in December 2019, presumed from the city of Wuhan, Hubei province in China, and the subsequent declaration of the disease as a pandemic by the World Health Organization as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in March 2020, had a significant impact on health care systems globally. Each country responded to this disease in different ways, however this was done broadly by fortifying and prioritizing health care provision as well as introducing social lockdown aiming to contain the infection and minimizing the risk of transmission. In the United Kingdom, a lockdown was introduced by the government on March 23, 2020 and all health care services were focussed to challenge the impact of COVID‐19. To do so, the United Kingdom National Health Service had to undergo widespread service reconfigurations and the so‐called “Nightingale Hospitals” were created de novo to bolster bed provision, and industries were asked to direct efforts to the production of ventilators. A government‐led public health campaign was publicized under the slogan of: “Stay home, Protect the NHS (National Health Service), Save lives.” The approach had a significant impact on the delivery of all surgical services but particularly cardiac surgery with its inherent critical care bed capacity. This paper describes the impact on provision for elective and emergency cardiac surgery in the United Kingdom, with a focus on aortovascular disease. We describe our aortovascular activity and outcomes during the period of UK lockdown and present a patient survey of attitudes to aortic surgery during COVID‐19 pandemic.

[1]  A. Harky,et al.  COVID‐19 and Oncology: Service transformation during pandemic , 2020, Cancer medicine.

[2]  A. Harky,et al.  Cardiac manifestations in COVID‐19 patients—A systematic review , 2020, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[3]  D. Balmforth,et al.  The Pan London Emergency Cardiac Surgery service: Coordinating a response to the COVID‐19 pandemic , 2020, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[4]  A. Harky,et al.  Impact of COVID‐19 on cardiac surgical training: Our experience in the United Kingdom , 2020, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[5]  A. Harky,et al.  Examining the impact of COVID‐19 on cardiac surgery services: The lessons learned from this pandemic , 2020, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[6]  A. Harky,et al.  Tele-oncology in the COVID-19 Era: The Way Forward? , 2020, Trends in Cancer.

[7]  A. Harky,et al.  The impact of COVID‐19 on the provision of cardiac surgical services , 2020, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[8]  A. Harky,et al.  At the heart of COVID‐19 , 2020, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[9]  A. Harky,et al.  COVID-19 and Multiorgan Response , 2020, Current Problems in Cardiology.

[10]  B. Bloom,et al.  COVID-19, a UK perspective , 2020, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[11]  J. Hollander,et al.  Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  E. Dong,et al.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[13]  Clinical Guide to Surgical Prioritisation During the Coronavirus Pandemic , 2020 .