The Risk of Bloodstream Infection Associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Compared with Central Venous Catheters in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are associated with central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). The magnitude of this risk relative to central venous catheters (CVCs) is unknown. Objective. To compare risk of CLABSI between PICCs and CVCs. Methods MEDLINE, CinAHL, Scopus, EmBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. Full-text studies comparing the risk of CLABSI between PICCs and CVCs were included. Studies involving adults 18 years of age or older who underwent insertion of a PICC or a CVC and reported CLABSI were included in our analysis. Studies were evaluated using the Downs and Black scale for risk of bias. Random effects meta-analyses were used to generate summary estimates of CLABSI risk in patients with PICCs versus CVCs. Results. Of 1,185 studies identified, 23 studies involving 57,250 patients met eligibility criteria. Twenty of 23 eligible studies reported the total number of CLABSI episodes in patients with PICCs and CVCs. Pooled meta-analyses of these studies revealed that PICCs were associated with a lower risk of CLABSI than were CVCs (relative risk [RR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.94). Statistical heterogeneity prompted subgroup analysis, which demonstrated that CLABSI reduction was greatest in outpatients (RR [95% CI], 0.22 [0.18-0.27]) compared with hospitalized patients who received PICCs (RR [95% CI], 0.73 [0.54-0.98]). Thirteen of the included 23 studies reported CLABSI per catheter-day. Within these studies, PICC-related CLABSI occurred as frequently as CLABSI from CVCs (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], 0.91 [0.46-1.79]). Limitations. Only 1 randomized trial met inclusion criteria. CLABSI definition and infection prevention strategies were variably reported. Few studies reported infections by catheter-days. Conclusions. Although PICCs are associated with a lower risk of CLABSI than CVCs in outpatients, hospitalized patients may be just as likely to experience CLABSI with PICCs as with CVCs. Consideration of risks and benefits before PICC use in inpatient settings is warranted.

[1]  A. Palmo,et al.  Catheter-related complications in cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: a prospective study of over 51,000 catheter days. , 2013, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[2]  J. Galloway,et al.  Characterization of post-hospital infections in adults requiring home parenteral nutrition. , 2013, Nutrition.

[3]  C. Holzmueller,et al.  A multicenter, phased, cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[4]  B. Kuehn.  Hospitals slash central line infections with program that empowers nurses. , 2012, JAMA.

[5]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. , 2012, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Doucette,et al.  Vascular access devices in leukemia: a retrospective review amongst patients treated at The Ottawa Hospital with induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia , 2012, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[7]  Simon C. Mathews,et al.  Eradicating Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections Statewide , 2012, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[8]  Sheri Chernetsky Tejedor,et al.  Temporary Central Venous Catheter Utilization Patterns in a Large Tertiary Care Center Tracking the “Idle Central Venous Catheter” , 2012, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  Devin L. Brown,et al.  Risk factors associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related large vein thrombosis in neurological intensive care patients , 2012, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  Carol E Cheng,et al.  Iatrogenic skin injury in hospitalized patients. , 2011, Clinics in dermatology.

[11]  R. Gunst,et al.  Peripherally inserted central catheters may lower the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections in patients in surgical intensive care units. , 2011, Surgical infections.

[12]  S. Noori,et al.  Exchange of peripherally inserted central catheters is associated with an increased risk for bloodstream infection. , 2011, American journal of perinatology.

[13]  A. Clements,et al.  Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: a prospective cohort study. , 2011, The Journal of hospital infection.

[14]  N. Reich,et al.  Central line-associated bloodstream infection in hospitalized children with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: extending risk analyses outside the intensive care unit. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[15]  D. Pittet,et al.  Hospital-wide survey of the use of central venous catheters. , 2011, The Journal of hospital infection.

[16]  L. Saiman,et al.  Statewide NICU Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates Decline After Bundles and Checklists , 2011, Pediatrics.

[17]  L. Mermel.  What is the predominant source of intravascular catheter infections? , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[18]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[19]  Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections--United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. , 2011, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[20]  S. Szpunar,et al.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in the acute care setting: A safe alternative to high-risk short-term central venous catheters. , 2010, American journal of infection control.

[21]  J. Saffle,et al.  Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters and Central Venous Catheters in Burn Patients: A Comparative Review , 2010, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[22]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[23]  D. Warren,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[24]  J. Seymour,et al.  Infective and thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: prospective evaluation of nontunneled devices , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[25]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[27]  M. DeLegge,et al.  Central venous access in the home parenteral nutrition population-you PICC. , 2005, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[28]  D. Maki,et al.  Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients. , 2005, Chest.

[29]  N. Safdar.  Bloodstream Infection: An Ounce of Prevention Is a Ton of Work , 2005, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[30]  Alexander J Sutton,et al.  What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  D. Maki,et al.  The pathogenesis of catheter-related bloodstream infection with noncuffed short-term central venous catheters , 2004, Intensive Care Medicine.

[32]  E. Wong,et al.  Prevalence of the Use of Central Venous Access Devices Within and Outside of the Intensive Care Unit: Results of a Survey Among Hospitals in the Prevention Epicenter Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , 2003, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[33]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  G. Lambertenghi-Deliliers,et al.  Central Venous Catheter-related Complications in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors and Prophylactic Measures , 2003, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[35]  N. Moureau,et al.  Central venous catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[36]  Vivien Griffiths,et al.  Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs): do they have a role in the care of the critically ill patient? , 2002, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[37]  L. Mermel,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections , 2001, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[38]  P. Major,et al.  Central venous catheters for infusion therapy in gastrointestinal cancer. A comparative study of tunnelled centrally placed catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters. , 2001, Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society.

[39]  J. Murray,et al.  Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters. , 2000, Clinical nutrition.

[40]  D. Duerksen,et al.  Peripherally inserted central catheters for parenteral nutrition: a comparison with centrally inserted catheters. , 1999, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[41]  J. R. Smith,et al.  Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[42]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[43]  R. Paz-Fumagalli,et al.  Impact of peripherally inserted central catheters on phlebitic complications of peripheral intravenous therapy in spinal cord injury patients. , 1997, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[44]  W. Souba,et al.  Safety and efficacy of total parenteral nutrition delivered via a peripherally inserted central venous catheter. , 1996, Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

[45]  G. Bodey,et al.  The duration of placement as a predictor of peripheral and pulmonary arterial catheter infections. , 1993, The Journal of hospital infection.

[46]  D. Graham,et al.  Infectious complications among patients receiving home intravenous therapy with peripheral, central, or peripherally placed central venous catheters. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[47]  E. Schuman,et al.  Vascular access options for outpatient cancer therapy. , 1987, American journal of surgery.