Efficient search of multiple types of targets.

Random searches often take place in fragmented landscapes. Also, in many instances like animal foraging, significant benefits to the searcher arise from visits to a large diversity of patches with a well-balanced distribution of targets found. Up to date, such aspects have been widely ignored in the usual single-objective analysis of search efficiency, in which one seeks to maximize just the number of targets found per distance traversed. Here we address the problem of determining the best strategies for the random search when these multiple-objective factors play a key role in the process. We consider a figure of merit (efficiency function), which properly "scores" the mentioned tasks. By considering random walk searchers with a power-law asymptotic Lévy distribution of step lengths, p(ℓ)∼ℓ(-μ), with 1<μ≤3, we show that the standard optimal strategy with μ(opt)≈2 no longer holds universally. Instead, optimal searches with enhanced superdiffusivity emerge, including values as low as μ(opt)≈1.3 (i.e., tending to the ballistic limit). For the general theory of random search optimization, our findings emphasize the necessity to correctly characterize the multitude of aims in any concrete metric to compare among possible candidates to efficient strategies. In the context of animal foraging, our results might explain some empirical data pointing to stronger superdiffusion (μ<2) in the search behavior of different animal species, conceivably associated to multiple goals to be achieved in fragmented landscapes.

[1]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Unveiling a mechanism for species decline in fragmented habitats: fragmentation induced reduction in encounter rates , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  Daniel Campos,et al.  Stochastic Foundations in Movement Ecology , 2014 .

[3]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Optimal random searches of revisitable targets: Crossover from superdiffusive to ballistic random walks , 2004 .

[4]  M. Hoddle The effect of prey species and environmental complexity on the functional response of Franklinothrips orizabensis: a test of the fractal foraging model , 2003 .

[5]  Todd M. Scanlon,et al.  Positive feedbacks promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation , 2007, Nature.

[6]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Ecological Processes That Affect Populations in Complex Landscapes , 1992 .

[7]  Stanley,et al.  Stochastic process with ultraslow convergence to a Gaussian: The truncated Lévy flight. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[8]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[9]  Aleksei V. Chechkin,et al.  Lévy flights do not always optimize random blind search for sparse targets , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? , 2008, Ecology.

[11]  Lakhmi C. Jain,et al.  Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2005, Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization.

[12]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Balancing the competing demands of harvesting and safety from predation: Lévy walk searches outperform composite Brownian walk searches but only when foraging under the risk of predation , 2010 .

[13]  I ScottKirkpatrick Optimization by Simulated Annealing: Quantitative Studies , 1984 .

[14]  M. Ritchie Scale-dependent foraging and patch choice in fractal environments , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[15]  A M Reynolds,et al.  Optimising the success of random destructive searches: Lévy walks can outperform ballistic motions. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  J. A. Kitchell Deep-sea foraging pathways: an analysis of randomness and resource exploitation , 1979, Paleobiology.

[17]  George L. Hunt,et al.  Foraging in a fractal environment: Spatial patterns in a marine predator-prey system , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Adaptive Lévy walks can outperform composite Brownian walks in non-destructive random searching scenarios , 2009 .

[19]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[20]  G M Viswanathan,et al.  And yet it optimizes: Comment on "Liberating Lévy walk research from the shackles of optimal foraging" by A.M. Reynolds. , 2015, Physics of life reviews.

[21]  L. R. da Silva,et al.  Search dynamics at the edge of extinction: Anomalous diffusion as a critical survival state , 2007 .

[22]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Quantifying patch distribution at multiple spatial scales: applications to wildlife-habitat models , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  D. Bottjer,et al.  Paleoecology of a large Early Cambrian bioturbator , 2000 .

[25]  A. King,et al.  Extinction Thresholds for Species in Fractal Landscapes , 1999 .

[26]  Gandhi M. Viswanathan Improvements in the statistical approach to random Levy flight searches M.G.E. da Luz, S.V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, E.P. Raposo, H.E. Stanley, , 2001 .

[27]  A. King,et al.  Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Can spontaneous cell movements be modelled as Lévy walks , 2010 .

[29]  M. Rietkerk,et al.  Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems , 2007, Nature.

[30]  I. Khokhlova,et al.  The effect of vegetation cover on vigilance and foraging tactics in the fat sand rat Psammomys obesus , 2001, Journal of Ethology.

[31]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Spatial Aggregation and Neutral Models in Fractal Landscapes , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Marcos C. Santos,et al.  Survival in patchy landscapes: the interplay between dispersal, habitat loss and fragmentation , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[33]  S. L. Lima Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives , 1998 .

[34]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Conditions under which a superdiffusive random-search strategy is necessary. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  Fractal reorientation clocks: Linking animal behavior to statistical patterns of search , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  R. Sibly,et al.  Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  G M Viswanathan,et al.  Robustness of optimal random searches in fragmented environments. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  Kimberly A. With,et al.  Habitat area trumps fragmentation effects on arthropods in an experimental landscape system , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[39]  C. Kremen,et al.  Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Kjell Einar Erikstad,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS: THE HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEABIRDS AND PREY , 2000 .

[41]  Felicity A. Huntingford,et al.  Feeding and Avoiding Predation Hazard: the Behavioral Response of the Prey , 2010 .

[42]  A. Reynolds Liberating Lévy walk research from the shackles of optimal foraging. , 2015, Physics of life reviews.

[43]  E. Wajnberg Multi-objective behavioural mechanisms are adopted by foraging animals to achieve several optimality goals simultaneously. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[44]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  How Landscape Heterogeneity Frames Optimal Diffusivity in Searching Processes , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[45]  Tanya Latty,et al.  Food quality and the risk of light exposure affect patch-choice decisions in the slime mold Physarum polycephalum. , 2010, Ecology.

[46]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Lévy flight patterns are predicted to be an emergent property of a bumblebees’ foraging strategy , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[47]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  Stochastic Optimal Foraging: Tuning Intensive and Extensive Dynamics in Random Searches , 2014, PloS one.

[48]  M. Palmer,et al.  Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial patterns of plant communities , 1988, Vegetatio.

[49]  Sabrina Fossette,et al.  High activity and Lévy searches: jellyfish can search the water column like fish , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Joseph A. Brown,et al.  Predator distribution and habitat patch area determine predation rates on Age-0 juvenile cod Gadus spp. , 2003 .

[51]  B. Tolkamp,et al.  The evolution of the control of food intake , 2002, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[52]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[53]  Sergey V. Buldyrev,et al.  Lévy flights and random searches , 2009 .

[54]  Brian Hoover,et al.  Prey Patch Patterns Predict Habitat Use by Top Marine Predators with Diverse Foraging Strategies , 2013, PloS one.

[55]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility , 2010, Science.

[56]  Ernesto P. Raposo,et al.  The influence of the environment on Lévy random search efficiency: Fractality and memory effects , 2012 .

[57]  Andrea J. Liu,et al.  Generalized Lévy walks and the role of chemokines in migration of effector CD8+ T cells , 2012, Nature.

[58]  M. A. Rodrigues,et al.  Drosophila melanogaster larvae make nutritional choices that minimize developmental time. , 2015, Journal of insect physiology.

[59]  C. Bernstein,et al.  Facing multiple information sources while foraging on successive patches: how does a parasitoid deal with experience? , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  David W. Sims,et al.  A new approach for objective identification of turns and steps in organism movement data relevant to random walk modelling , 2013 .

[61]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  The influence of turning angles on the success of non-oriented animal searches. , 2008, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[62]  D. Goulson Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics Foraging Strategies of Insects for Gathering Nectar and Pollen, and Implications for Plant Ecology and Evolution Choice of Flower Species Specialisation versus Generalisation , 2022 .

[63]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  The universality class of random searches in critically scarce environments , 2012 .

[64]  T. Geisel,et al.  Natural human mobility patterns and spatial spread of infectious diseases , 2011, 1103.6224.

[65]  H. Stanley,et al.  The Physics of Foraging: An Introduction to Random Searches and Biological Encounters , 2011 .

[66]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[67]  P. Fauchald,et al.  Foraging in a Hierarchical Patch System , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[68]  Marcos C. Santos,et al.  Dynamical robustness of Lévy search strategies. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[69]  R. Metzler,et al.  Facilitated diffusion with DNA coiling , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.